• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

AVATAR cabinet: SINGLE 4 ohm cab solution?

ArturoOsito

Guest
Aug 21, 2012
191
13
Choosing an avatar box (yeah!!) and since they're non-returnable, I need all of your trusted experience. It's down to the b410 vs the tb153. The head will probably be a shuttle 9.2, and the musical style is reggae dance-rock.

Looking for subwoofer type reggae-dance sounds. No slapping, no fuzz, just big bottom end fingerstyle with some walking around and occasional arpeggios.

SO the question: the tb153 has a killer low-end sound, BUT I'm looking for a single 4ohm cab solution that could cover a variety of gigging situations. Which would point to the 410...but, will I be able to get big subwoofer tones out of it? Or is it a more treble-y box? I would hope I could EQ any sound, but will I be fighting the 410's nature?

Side note: I played a MARKBASS cmd102p, and the tone was huge and perfect. So apparently, tens can do anything...
 
No difference in sound between a 4 ohm and 8 ohm cab, VERY VERY little difference from the power increase with a 4 ohm cab. You are MUCH better off having the ability to add a second 8 ohm cab as many that have not listened to this advice have found out.

+1

And with the Genz anp the OP is running he will be able to push an 8 Ohm 410 to just about its limits. Why limit yourself needlessly?
 
My B410 NEO was not as deep / full sounding as my Carvin BRX 10.2. The B410 had an midrange presence that added clarity and made the cabinet fairly bright sounding.

If you listen to the youtube demo videos from Avatar, you can see the difference in sound between the B410 and the TB153. I suspect the latter will be closer to giving you the sound you want.

- Keith -
 
I'm using a Shuttle 9.0 and a 4 ohm 4x10. Both are new to me (so I'm sure I'm a bit biased) but it is the THUNDER! I can understand the idea of going with the 8 ohm stuff if you feel that you might want an additional cab though. I personally don't feel the need for that.
 
I'm using a Shuttle 9.0 and a 4 ohm 4x10. Both are new to me (so I'm sure I'm a bit biased) but it is the THUNDER! I can understand the idea of going with the 8 ohm stuff if you feel that you might want an additional cab though. I personally don't feel the need for that.

The point is, you would get just as loud with an 8 Ohm cab. The mechanical limitations are such that once you hit the 500 or so wattage point you are not really going to gain more volume out of the 410. So what is the point of limiting yourself to one cab? If you dont ever need the second cab, fine, dont use it. The option will be there should you ever want it though.
 
The point is, you would get just as loud with an 8 Ohm cab. The mechanical limitations are such that once you hit the 500 or so wattage point you are not really going to gain more volume out of the 410. So what is the point of limiting yourself to one cab? If you dont ever need the second cab, fine, dont use it. The option will be there should you ever want it though.

So I have a 4-ohm Avatar TB153. I sometimes wonder whether I should have gotten the 8-ohm if I were to do it all over again, since Dave will make them with the "mirrored" panel to stack two of them.

However, I have a Carvin BX500 which is stable to 2-ohms, and I also have a Crown XLS1500 which can drive two 4-ohm channels at 500 watts each.

With amps available like this, running two 4-ohm cabs is also a possibility. Unless I'm missing something.
 
I'm trying to decide between the GB shuttle 9.2 and the streamliner 900. Really the only thing stopping me from getting a STM is that supposedly it can sound muddy with the wrong cab or wrong room, and I can't have that haha.

Does anyone know which kind of cabs the STM doesn't "like?" STM 900 with a b410, would that be the best of both worlds or would they fight each other?

How much louder IS a 4ohm cab running at 900w than an 8ohm cab running at 500w?
 
Not even +3db (and that is *IF* the cab can even make use of the extra wattage)

Speaker ratings are thermal, not real world mechanical limits which are around 50% of the "thermal" rating.

^ This. Even if your cab has a "rating" of 1000 watts RMS, at bass frequencies you will only get clean reproduction at 400 watts if you're lucky. So sending additional wattage (by using a 4 ohm nominal load) will only produce more heat and distortion if not mechanical damage while the voice coils heat to the failure point.
 

Latest posts