• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bad idea?

Indeed, the MM is going to be louder than the J. Especially because of the pickup placement.

Consider wiring the MM pickup in parallel to reduce output and output impedance. Also consider switching-based schemes, as opposed to volumes and blends. Volumes and blends will cause weird behaviors as the mismatched impedances load each other.

FWIW, here's a bass with the MM-P configuration.
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
IMHO it depends on the particular pickups. Some MMs are hotter than others, and the same with Js.

Good call on the parallel wiring, though. That should even things out quite a bit.
 
It won't be near the neck, it would be in exact P territory.

Okay... right in the middle. So again - what's the goal, sound-wise? It's not like a P pickup is, by design, all that different sounding - I think you'll find that putting soapbar / MM p'up right there will result in it sound a whole lot like a P-bass. I guess that why I like the original Lakland arrangement, with the MM p'up by the bridge - I can sound (more or less) like a J bass, a MM, a P-bass or a MM+J, depending on how I set my balance/coil taps.

You might seek out a MM that has the two H option and see how that sounds for you before you sink that router blade into your wood.
 
I have a P, just trying to get a more refined P-ish tone. Yes they're both humbuckers but they are a completely different design. I'm looking for less mid grunt, more dynamics. The only bass I can think of that's similar is the Warwick FNA 4 stringers.
 
Last edited: