Tensions are starting to run a little high in one band. With the exception of our very good lead singer who is in his late 20s, everyone else is in their mid-50s to 60-ish. We are booked 'til the end of the year with at least 1 gig a month, which is perfect for most of us. The BL/LG and 1 or 2 others (we're an 8-pc band) want to gig as much as possible, every weekend if they could. He can't understand why we don't want to gig all the time and has started making waves about finding other members that are on the same page. To which, we've said, "go ahead". One of "our" guys is responsible for the best-paying gig(s) in our regular rotation, so we could survive a shake-up. One of the others on the BL's side is the back-up singer, who is terrible. As far as LGs go, the BL isn't that good, either.
I've told my co-worker, who brought me into the band, that I know of 2 guys who can both sing & play lead. We could re-form the band with either of these guys, reduce down to 5 or 6, thus improving our $$ cut, and be a better band in the end.
Problem is, this co-worker is a life-long friend of the BL/LG going back 50+ years, so I don't think it'll come to that. This despite the fact that he agrees the back-up singer (another longtime friend) & the BL/LG are probably the 2 weakest links in the band.
Those of us on the "infrequent gig schedule" side are still committed. We take our music responsibilities seriously. With spouses, partners, children &/or grandchildren, other interests, etc., we don't want or need to be out gigging every weekend.
Ironically, despite his level of "commitment", if someone is going to miss a chord change during a song, it's *usually* not one of us, but the BL/LG!