So I get a phone call last night from one of the guitarists in my band. He explains to me that the other guitarist is worried that we sound hollow when the two guitarists play harmonized solo's. Our band consists of:
Singer
Guitarist 1
Guitarist 2
Bass
Drums
We only have 1 or 2 songs out of 15 that have harmonized solo's. I agree that we sound thin during these solo's, but I don't like the idea of 3 guitarists. The guitarist that called me is on the fence about adding a guitarist and I'll find out the rest of the band's opinions on Sunday at rehearsal.
Before anyone goes there.....we actually DON'T have volume wars at rehearsal....Everyone is pretty good at controlling volumes so a volume war isn't on my list of con's to adding a 3rd guitarist. Money isn't an issue either. We're an original band, we're all in our late 30's and 40's with professional jobs and income, so we don't do this for the money.
My concerns are:
1 The sound. It seems to me that adding a 3rd guitarist will mud-up the overall sound of the band. I don't want to be involved with a 'wall-of-sound' sounding band.
2 The music. Some of our guitar music is intricate. I'm not saying it can't be replicated by 3 guitarists, but it's going to take a lot of extra work. This extra work isn't worth it to me just so we don't sound thin for a total of 1 minute and 45 seconds during fifteen songs' worth of material.
3 I didn't form this band....Actually....I was the last member to join. But, when I joined, I had my reservations about joining a band with two guitarists. It's never been my thing, but I like the music they had written and since joining, I love the music we write together. Two guitarists I can live with, as I knew there were two from the start, but now....
What say you, TalkBass? Would you be on-board with this idea?
Singer
Guitarist 1
Guitarist 2
Bass
Drums
We only have 1 or 2 songs out of 15 that have harmonized solo's. I agree that we sound thin during these solo's, but I don't like the idea of 3 guitarists. The guitarist that called me is on the fence about adding a guitarist and I'll find out the rest of the band's opinions on Sunday at rehearsal.
Before anyone goes there.....we actually DON'T have volume wars at rehearsal....Everyone is pretty good at controlling volumes so a volume war isn't on my list of con's to adding a 3rd guitarist. Money isn't an issue either. We're an original band, we're all in our late 30's and 40's with professional jobs and income, so we don't do this for the money.
My concerns are:
1 The sound. It seems to me that adding a 3rd guitarist will mud-up the overall sound of the band. I don't want to be involved with a 'wall-of-sound' sounding band.
2 The music. Some of our guitar music is intricate. I'm not saying it can't be replicated by 3 guitarists, but it's going to take a lot of extra work. This extra work isn't worth it to me just so we don't sound thin for a total of 1 minute and 45 seconds during fifteen songs' worth of material.
3 I didn't form this band....Actually....I was the last member to join. But, when I joined, I had my reservations about joining a band with two guitarists. It's never been my thing, but I like the music they had written and since joining, I love the music we write together. Two guitarists I can live with, as I knew there were two from the start, but now....
What say you, TalkBass? Would you be on-board with this idea?