Single bank? Let it go. We already have. I was referring to the banking system, not any individual bank.
Linc: That's the kind of political stuff that will close this thread.
my bad

TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Single bank? Let it go. We already have. I was referring to the banking system, not any individual bank.
Linc: That's the kind of political stuff that will close this thread.

I understand the principle of it ... however it doesn't work .. By the government doing it it makes these banks or whatever say "hey its ok if we screw up the government will bail us out" and thats not a good thingWith all due respect: the point of this is to do something to help the people of this country; namely, keep their banks, businesses and real estate markets functioning.
Keep reading there's good info out there...
I voted bankruptcy, however, before reading that piece I would have voted for a bailout. I live in the NY suburbs but I work in the city as a new hire at a company in the luxury sector. Usually, high end luxury does ok in times like these, however, 100% of our customer base are affluent women, and their husbands are telling them not to shop. This is a problem.
But at the same time, if the long term benefits of "teaching them a lesson" outweight the short term, then I guess I can go along with that... mostly because I live with my parents.
I gotta say though, I'm not looking forward to what this will do to Manhattan. We're going to lose billions in revenue when brokers and the others on wall street stop spending or move. While they're a fraction of the population, they represent the majority of taxation and discretional spending. A really good illustration of this is the side-by-side BMW and Mercedes dealerships in the Financial District, strategically located to suck in guys with a fresh bonus burning a hole through their Burberry suits. The Times or NY magazine reported on this last week, I'll see if I can find it and edit this post, for nothing else than to back up the above. It's not just the city and Long Island that will hurt, but Jersey City, Connecticut, and the like will all feel this a bit.
Edit: Found it, or if not the article, something close: http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/bloomberg-and-aides-meet-on-banking-crisis/
I feel for the people that will lose their homes, I can't imagine the heartbreak of such a thing, but I thought I'd throw a light on the people being vilified. Did Wall Street act imprudently? Yup. But we must remember that there is literally an army of people that will be touched by this: doormen, delivery services, restaurants, theater--basically anyone in the service industry.
One of the things bothering me is that the pundits throw around the quip that "what's good for wall st isn't good for main st," and I'd like to point out that I have a main street too. New York City has many main streets and they're going to hurt. Does warrant a 700 billion dollar pay out from everyone else? No. But I think I'm a little sensitive, having lived in and around Manhattan for my life, to the far far right wing referring to the City as evil, the new Babylon, etc. I even took a course in that kind of thing. There are just as many people in this city that didn't mess with someone's money a la Boiler Room. Let's not start the whole Small Town vs. Big City Liberal thing. That's so Decision 2004.
Is this thread political? if so I retract my statement and I was never here.![]()
Bankrupt.
Totally agree, Chris.I know there will be hell to pay, but I think that maybe a little hell is the only thing that will even begin to teach some of these jokers out there who've been acting like they've been playing with Monopoly money all this time that this isn't ******* monopoly. I don't think anybody should step in and catch the gray men when they dive from the 14th floor this time. Probably horrible of me, but there it is.
When Black Friday comes......
If I find that I've gone 40 miles down the wrong road in the opposite direction of where I want to go on a car trip what's a better strategy? To stop and get directions or just keep barrelling down the highway hoping to find the way?Indeed but we need something immediate (IMVHO), and then something else, carefully considered,that will fix it. I don't think you can fix it in the time necessary to unfreeze the banks, and I don't think we can wait until it's perfect and the political winds are blowing just so.
I also think that a bailout sends a bad message (prescendent). It basically says that you don't need to be financially responsible, the gov't will bail you out. This applies to banks as well as individuals who were living beyond their means.
Wow he comes off as an incredibly pompus jerk in that.Check out Steve Pearlstein's Q&A today
Invalid Link Removed
Check out Steve Pearlstein's Q&A today
Invalid Link Removed
Well, I'm sorry. But now their houses are dropping and there mortgages are double and it's terrible for them. Some got out in time, some are roughing out the storm, but I vote bankrupcy!
A correction is sorely needed and we cannot reward these business's for their irresponsibility.

I definitely hear that. Both neighbors on either side of me are trying to sell (for reasons other than the market) and they're just asking too much. They both want something like 1.2m (which wasn't crazy for the nice parts of south shore nassau 3 years ago), but the houses are total tear downs and they're just gonna sit on the market. It's a shame, I want them outa there.![]()
Perhaps.If folks read either one of these before voting, I bet most would vote a heck of a lot differently.