• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Barden Split P - anyone here using it?

I decided to post this under basses instead of pickups because this is also about a bass I'm enjoying quite a bit.

I was just looking for a beater bass to maybe turn into fretless or maybe just put flatwounds on - I guess just a project to fool around with and have a different bass. So I picked up an old, early 80's Yamaha BB300 for next to nothing. It needed a lot of setup and I've got some lightweight tuners on order because it has a bit of neck dive ... but the neck feels really good and after a good setup, the action is low and fast and really comfortable. Reminds me of a pre-CBS Fender in a lot of ways. The stock pickup is pretty weak though.

So I bought a used Barden split P from a TB'er and slapped in there just to see how it sounds and OMG, this thing is so damn hot. I have to turn the volume way down to get it to match my other basses (which have fairly hot pickups).

I'm trying to decide what I think about it - it certainly is a blast to play, but it's more work since you have to play really clean -- this pickup reveals even the lightest brush against a string. Since I'm fairly new and practicing hard on my technique, I'm finding that it's really teaching me a lot to practice on this bass while trying reduce the string noise as much as possible.

The brightest strings I have (Prosteel stainless rounds) are on my other Yamaha (BB1200s) with stock Yamaha reverse P (higher end Yamaha and much better pickup than the stock pup that was in this BB300) and I took the oldest, dullest strings I have and put on the bass with the Barden --- it's still way brighter than the bass with the bright strings. I'm thinking I need some flats.

Anyway ... I'm curious to hear your experience with the Barden split P and how you like it.
BB300_Barden.jpg
 
As an experiment, I recorded directly into my DAW, no bass amp or preamp, and tried to play the same little riff the same way. I had to turn up the gain quite a bit on the bass without the Barden to get the volumes close. And I'm a new bass player so excuse my lack of technique.

This would be a better test if I had the same strings on both basses - but remember the strings on the Bass with the Barden are much older and deader (and nickle) while the strings on the other bass are stainless with much more zing to them (if both sets of strings are played on the same bass, the stainless are a lot zingier)

BB300_Barden is Passive pickup connected to whatever stock pots were in the bass
BB1200s_Active has an EMG 2-way EQ with treble boosted
BB1200s_Passive has the EMG EQ bypassed
all three files have the passive tone control on 10
fingered in same place, over the P pickup, on all three
 

Attachments