• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Bass progress

Just a thought.

Building your own bass is a great accomplishment and therefore something you should be proud of. BUT... if I were you, I wouldn't broadcast the fact that I was copying a brand named bass.

There have been a number of companies sued over copies that came too close to the original product. I don't know the specifics as to why they were sued. I don't know how much a company will come after you if you are just making it for yourself (as apposed to making money off of some other company's design by selling the copies).

I would tread lightly though. Just a thought.
 
Originally posted by Bassmanbob
Just a thought.

Building your own bass is a great accomplishment and therefore something you should be proud of. BUT... if I were you, I wouldn't broadcast the fact that I was copying a brand named bass.

There have been a number of companies sued over copies that came too close to the original product. I don't know the specifics as to why they were sued. I don't know how much a company will come after you if you are just making it for yourself (as apposed to making money off of some other company's design by selling the copies).

I would tread lightly though. Just a thought.

Bob, Phil doesn't have anything to worry about running afoul of RIC's police. The courts recognize the difference between replica's built by individuals for their personal use and copies built by competing companies and designed to cut into the market share held by the original design. As long as Phil doesn't start building multiple copies and selling them, he won't have a problem. As a matter of fact, Ebay will even let you sell a RIC copy but you can't use any RIC references in your ad. That's legit since these trademarks are owned by RIC and limiting their use is only responsible brand maintenance. There is nothing illegal about the sale, just the use of RIC terms in it's promotion. The final aspect of this issue is damages. RIC can always insist on clamping down on the use of it's designs in commerce but for them to be compensated for this illegal activity, they must demonstrate damages. Phil's homemade bass doesn't rise to that level at all.
 
yeah, i am pretty sure i will be safe. One home made bass wont ruin a bass... The only reason i decided to copy the design was because its a simple one for a first homemade bass. I plan on designing my own next time around, this is just a test. thanks for the concern though.

Phil