• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

BC Rich Widow

does anyone own one i love their shape but i want to hear how they play

heres a pic from the bc rich site


ps. please show pics
 

Attachments

  • sm_bass_widow.jpg
    sm_bass_widow.jpg
    8.2 KB · Views: 448
It's quite new, I havn't seen it yet in any shop. I believe it plays like other BC Riches, but I bet somebody else can tell you more.

Widows have been around for more than 20 years.

I've played a few of the new Mockingbirds and Warlocks and even a Beast and wasn't at all thrilled with any of them soundwise and ergonomically. As a matter of fact, the 'new' Richs aren't comparable to the vintage models in quality and sound, but that's just MO. It's better to play before you pay.
 
Widows have been around for more than 20 years.

I've played a few of the new Mockingbirds and Warlocks and even a Beast and wasn't at all thrilled with any of them soundwise and ergonomically. As a matter of fact, the 'new' Richs aren't comparable to the vintage models in quality and sound, but that's just MO. It's better to play before you pay.

BC Rich is a company that makes killer guitars, but the designs don't translate well to bass. They shouldn't sound too odd as they're wood just like everything else, but most people who order them focus more on the look than the guts of the electronics.

One thing about pointy instruments is that the edges are fragile as hell and can chip if you look at them wrong.

My 2 cents....go for comfort. It's practically impossible to have proficient speed when you play with something that's loaded with neck dive.
 
BC Rich is a company that makes killer guitars, but the designs don't translate well to bass. They shouldn't sound too odd as they're wood just like everything else, but most people who order them focus more on the look than the guts of the electronics.

One thing about pointy instruments is that the edges are fragile as hell and can chip if you look at them wrong.

My 2 cents....go for comfort. It's practically impossible to have proficient speed when you play with something that's loaded with neck dive.

I can't argue with anything you've said, except for the sound quality. The new Richs that are being sold at your local Sam Ash or GC are loaded with crap electronics. Having owned a couple of early 80's Richs, I can attest to the sound quality of those instruments compared to the standard Rich fare of today.
 
I can't argue with anything you've said, except for the sound quality. The new Richs that are being sold at your local Sam Ash or GC are loaded with crap electronics. Having owned a couple of early 80's Richs, I can attest to the sound quality of those instruments compared to the standard Rich fare of today.

agreed.

I own 3 mockingbirds. Won't even look at any Richs post 85.
 
Widows have been around for more than 20 years.

I've played a few of the new Mockingbirds and Warlocks and even a Beast and wasn't at all thrilled with any of them soundwise and ergonomically. As a matter of fact, the 'new' Richs aren't comparable to the vintage models in quality and sound, but that's just MO. It's better to play before you pay.

Oh sorry, I really thought they where new!
As for the poor quality I have to agree. If you want a bass with a stunning BC Rich like look and want it to sound great, you should better contact Moser.
 
started of great...then went down from there. I'm not sure about now, but back when i was bass searching, these used nato wood. nato = cheap asian mahagony = no good.
I think they changed the woods recently but makes sure you dont get ones from the nineties to the mid 2000's.

Though if i could get a bass from there, it would have to be Paolo's Warlock 5 string of course. That white looks stunning.
 
my beast is a 2004 and its better IMO than the MIM Jazz that i play in school... both have the same strings and were setup by the same person, and the j has a badass on it... only problem i have is that when i play my own in the schools amps i have to turn them way down because the pups are so much hotter.

but if i had the option looking back, i'd've rather gotten a mockingbird... even though i have yet to find it to be a big deal, the body is a little more accepted in different types of music, even though the tone can be matched to whatever
 
That Widow pictured with the hour glass inlays I own. That was the first cut of the Widow shape referred to as the MK1 (Mark1) cut. MK1 cuts I believe were from around '88 or '89 when Blackie from WASP designed it up until '97 I believe. After that the shape got retooled and made into what is referred to as the MK2 cut. That is a slightly more elongated version where is I think the MK1 is more compact. The WMD widows I have never played. All my MK1 Widows (I own 3...not sure how many were built but I was told around 50 or so) and they are shaging killer. The MK2 I owned played awesome too. As for the one your were asking about I cannot say. I only play vintage BC Richs these days so I don't know how any of the newer ones are.
 

Attachments

  • DS01980997_1.jpg
    DS01980997_1.jpg
    72.2 KB · Views: 761