I missed John's discussion in the Rumble Club. My apologies. Thanks for clarifying the situation.![]()
Here ya go, Aki:
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I missed John's discussion in the Rumble Club. My apologies. Thanks for clarifying the situation.![]()
Thanks, G-dog!
Thank you.
Not discounting your experience, but that seems to not be the case for a LOT of bass players!Interesting. I found the Rumble 100 is so shy of any useable mid range as to be virtually un-giggable. Switched to Ampeg which has more mid range.
Cort B5 Element run passive (no passive tone control), very slightly favoring the Neck pickup with the Blend control (I just tweaked it to sound the best to me while using the Opus, favoring punch while balancing note definition and midrange harshness).I have a couple questions that may serve to help you. What is/are your signal chain and settings? Are you using new strings? I notice a tendency for my beloved Rumble 100 to have a bit of forwardness (strident/inharmonic distortion?) in the upper mids (without any of the preset tone buttons pressed) and the controls at 12 o'clock. I find it is easy to tame with turning the treble control on the amp to 10 and rolling my tone control back on my 4-string Jazz bass. (I will post an image of a typical output from the R100 below). I find engaging the "vintage" button helps to smooth out the upper mids quality of the R100.
New strings will give you angry piano tone which highlights that characteristics that you mention about the R100.
For a brief time, I "budget" bi-amped with the Ampeg RB-110 and the R100. The RB-110 had a tendency to smooth out the quality of midrange of the R100. Perhaps that might be a pathway for you?
Sometimes I have some brief downtime and wander into guitar stores and try out equipment. Of the budget amps, I find the MarkBass CMB line to generally gel better with active basses than the Rumble and Ampeg lines.
I would recommend that you connect with the Rumble Club, especially, @G-Dog. The community there can likely guide you well.
If you use your Opus significantly, perhaps an FRFR amp/cab might be a better long-term pathway for you?
What bass are you using and what are your EQ settings? What do you consider useable midrange? This is what I get out of my R100:
View attachment 7279458
Settings/conditions: Fender Jazz bass with "matured" Super 7250s, PV ‘62 pickups, Rumble 100, no tone shaper presets engaged, gain at 1 0'clock, tone controls at 12 o’clock, except treble at 10 o’clock, volume at 8:30, measured at 1.5 feet away and on-axis, Open E, picked with med gel pick with a moderate downstroke motion, neck 100%, bridge 50%, tone 70%. Purple line is peak, yellow line is the level after approximately 2 seconds measured in a 12 x 12 studio with carpeting and moderate amounts of furniture.
Two ports: 3" diameter & 2.25" long.If you have the port measurements, someone may be willing/able to model the Celestion for you.
I have a set of Dunlop SS Flatwounds that I keep intending to put on, but the EB CF's do sound quite good still.Cort B5 Element run passive (no passive tone control), very slightly favoring the Neck pickup with the Blend control (I just tweaked it to sound the best to me while using the Opus, favoring punch while balancing note definition and midrange harshness).
Ernie Ball Cobalt Flatwound strings (about 7 or 8 months old).
I mostly use the Opus run into the FX Return of the R100c which bypasses the combo's preamp and control the SPL with the Master control.
The Two Notes Opus.
- I'm mainly using the Foundry (Fender Showman) or Foundry Bass (Fender Super Bassman 300 non-overdrive channel) Preamp Modeling + the 6L6 Power Amp Modeling in the Push-Pull Triode setting, with no Cab Sim.
I have a crapload of other Presets some of which use other Preamp & Power Amp models and some use Cab Sims (my favorite of which models the Mesa Powerhouse 1000).
I will try the settings you suggest tomorrow running straight into the Instrument Input with my B5 set, first passive and then active.
I have no desire to buy another combo amp to complement this one.
I was torn between this combo and an Electro Voice ZLX-12P-G2 active PA speaker (around $600 new).
This one came up at a good price and I jumped it.
After experimenting today with the Opus and running it at 80% Volume and the R100c Master all the way up, I decided that it sounds great and I think I would work in any environment except VERY loud stuff with no PA support.
The HPF allows significant output when hitting a low B and the harshness seems tamed while still allowing good note definition.
I have a decent audio system that I can play music along with.
That Celestion BN12-300S (4) is still calling my name though with the promise of cleaner and louder - I remember how easy it is to get lost in a loud, busy band mix.
If I did not have the Opus, I think it would be a no-brainer!
I guess I'll decide fairly soon.
Thank you for the assist!Let's put the info in one post and see if anyone feels motivated.
Request Modeling for:
Celestion BN12-300S (4)
View attachment 7280062
Box Properties:
Internal Volume: 1.3 Cu. ft
Two Ports: 3" diameter x 2.25" length
Thank you for the detailed response. My settings posted were in response to the "no usable midrange" claim. I wanted to give a graph that portrays one of my usual settings for @tvbop to comment whether that would fall in the "no usable midrange" criteria. Ideally, @tvbop could upload a graph of his/her frequency response graph of one of the settings on his Ampeg gear that has "usable midrange". IMO, having a graph to complement descriptions helps with discussions. It adds a touch of objectivity and validates how a person perceives. A somewhat flat response graph like my setup has in the one setting may truly not have enough midrange for what @tvbop wants out of a setup. There is nothing wrong with that.Cort B5 Element run passive (no passive tone control), very slightly favoring the Neck pickup with the Blend control (I just tweaked it to sound the best to me while using the Opus, favoring punch while balancing note definition and midrange harshness).
Ernie Ball Cobalt Flatwound strings (about 7 or 8 months old).
I mostly use the Opus run into the FX Return of the R100c which bypasses the combo's preamp and control the SPL with the Master control.
The Two Notes Opus.
- I'm mainly using the Foundry (Fender Showman) or Foundry Bass (Fender Super Bassman 300 non-overdrive channel) Preamp Modeling + the 6L6 Power Amp Modeling in the Push-Pull Triode setting, with no Cab Sim.
I have a crapload of other Presets some of which use other Preamp & Power Amp models and some use Cab Sims (my favorite of which models the Mesa Powerhouse 1000).
I will try the settings you suggest tomorrow running straight into the Instrument Input with my B5 set, first passive and then active.
I have no desire to buy another combo amp to complement this one.
I was torn between this combo and an Electro Voice ZLX-12P-G2 active PA speaker (around $600 new).
This one came up at a good price and I jumped it.
After experimenting today with the Opus and running it at 80% Volume and the R100c Master all the way up, I decided that it sounds great and I think I would work in any environment except VERY loud stuff with no PA support.
The HPF allows significant output when hitting a low B and the harshness seems tamed while still allowing good note definition.
I have a decent audio system that I can play music along with.
That Celestion BN12-300S (4) is still calling my name though with the promise of cleaner and louder - I remember how easy it is to get lost in a loud, busy band mix.
If I did not have the Opus, I think it would be a no-brainer!
I guess I'll decide fairly soon.
Glad to hear you have given GENOME a whirl! On an unrelated note, the TSM-Ai amp "THE 400" is great - using it all the time at the moment! If you have any GENOME-related questions, I'm always happy to weigh in!Thank you for the detailed response. My settings posted were in response to the "no usable midrange" claim. I wanted to give a graph that portrays one of my usual settings for @tvbop to comment whether that would fall in the "no usable midrange" criteria. Ideally, @tvbop could upload a graph of his/her frequency response graph of one of the settings on his Ampeg gear that has "usable midrange". IMO, having a graph to complement descriptions helps with discussions. It adds a touch of objectivity and validates how a person perceives. A somewhat flat response graph like my setup has in the one setting may truly not have enough midrange for what @tvbop wants out of a setup. There is nothing wrong with that.
I have Genome. I have done some superficial tinkering with it. Funny, but my favorite user-written patch so far is the Foundry that then adds some Peggy and ends up going into a "lowly" Rumble 500 IR. Just magic for me.
I appreciate the modifications that some have done with the Rumble 100. Nothing wrong with experimenting, eh?
Thanks, Ross. I appreciate the direct support. I will ask some newbie questions about the Two notes line up in the Two notes thread. I don't want to derail this thread like I do with so many...Glad to hear you have given GENOME a whirl! On an unrelated note, the TSM-Ai amp "THE 400" is great - using it all the time at the moment! If you have any GENOME-related questions, I'm always happy to weigh in!
I appreciate the input!Maybe you enjoy the process of this, but it seems like a problem that's quicker to fix with a better suited combo or rig.