TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Any one have any experience with the Universal Audio Solo/610 DI?
I've got a UA M610 and it's awesome. Very old skool, tubey tone to my ears.
hey do you have a fender american deluxe jazz? that would be crazy because i also have one going into the UA....is yours the MK610 or just M610?
I've got a 96 american jazz 5-string that goes into the my M-610, but I don't know if it's deluxe or not...It's a great combination. Really brings out the natural sound of the jazz bass, but add a little something to it that's hard to explain.
REDDI REDDI REDDI
I received that TAB-Funk V71 I mentioned. Unfortunately its gain selector broke in shipment (poor packing job), so I have to send it off to TAB for repair before I can do any real listening and comparison.
Here's a couple of pics just for interest however:
Link Removed
Link Removed
I was going to take a pic of the inside of the REDDI for comparison, but that's 14 screws I don't feel like dealing with. There are pics of the insides somewhere here on TB already. Essentially the REDDI has one tube, the V71 has two. None of those are 12A*7's. The REDDI has one massive audio transformer and a massive power supply transformer; the V71 has two substantial but not huge audio transformers and a same-size power transformer. The V71 has a parallel secondary balanced output that is post-tube and transformer, the REDDI does not. The V71 is a half-rack unit, the REDDI is a battleship. The input impedance of the V71 is 1 Meg, the z in of the REDDI is "minimum" 1.4 K (not sure how far a "nominal" rating would be from that "minimum").
I probably won't be able to comment usefully on the tone for a few weeks yet, until after it's been repaired and shipped back to me.
Originally posted by svtb15
+1,000,000,000
I have also been experimenting with their (A-Design the REDDI maker) EM500 Gold preamp as a DI to FOH... So far it is very impressive... Very clear with mucho headroom... DI or Preamp.. and i have run the REDDI into the EM500 pre then to FOH... very smooth and punchy with focus and clarity ..


I received that TAB-Funk V71 I mentioned. Unfortunately its gain selector broke in shipment (poor packing job), so I have to send it off to TAB for repair before I can do any real listening and comparison.
Here's a couple of pics just for interest however:
Link Removed
Link Removed
I was going to take a pic of the inside of the REDDI for comparison, but that's 14 screws I don't feel like dealing with. There are pics of the insides somewhere here on TB already. Essentially the REDDI has one tube, the V71 has two. None of those are 12A*7's. The REDDI has one massive audio transformer and a massive power supply transformer; the V71 has two substantial but not huge audio transformers and a same-size power transformer. The V71 has a parallel secondary balanced output that is post-tube and transformer, the REDDI does not. The V71 is a half-rack unit, the REDDI is a battleship. The input impedance of the V71 is 1 Meg, the z in of the REDDI is "minimum" 1.4 K (not sure how far a "nominal" rating would be from that "minimum").
I probably won't be able to comment usefully on the tone for a few weeks yet, until after it's been repaired and shipped back to me.
I also tried the Avalon options as well and build quality is above average, actually excellent but sound wise compared to my REDDI the U5 was a tad colder sounding. Though I do love the rack option of the Avalon and the solid state design would possibly make it more road worthy if your running around a lot. But this is just a guess. I have not toured with either units and only have used them in the studio.
I would get a REDDI but the sweetness of the tube and such are only available on the XLR out, not the 1/4". Why would you not do it both ways so FOH and stage amp can benefit from the goodness? I believe I read the designer/builder was only interested in building "studio" gear and when directly asked said he didn't want to make the change so tough luck.
Kind of dumb marketing if you ask me. I think some of us would be more tempted to drop $700 if that were the case. I know I would.
That's why I love my Aguilar DB900. The 1/4 thru is also affected by the tube. Great design!
In fact, I rented the REDDI a few weeks ago for a session (in fact it was more to try it than for the session but hey, they paid the rental!) and to my surprise I didn't really heard a difference with my Aguilar. I have to say I did the a/b at home, not at the studio so it may be my recording gear that's not good enough...or just my ears...
I did record the samples and may put it on a webpage for you guys to listen if you're interested.
To me they sounded almost the same. In fact I was having problems with the REDDI because the signal was REALLY hot!
I too find stupid that a DI so nice don't have a tube-buffered 1/4 output. IIRC, the first models didn't had any 1/4 out; they just had the XLR and that's it.
Anyway, for one time I'm happy with what I own over something more expensive!
To me they sounded almost the same. In fact I was having problems with the REDDI because the signal was REALLY hot!