Radial JDI (passive), Radial J48 (active), Countryman Type 85 (active), Avalon U5 (active).
I've heard these are the best, I've also heard the REDDI box with the tube pre is awesome too.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Radial JDI (passive), Radial J48 (active), Countryman Type 85 (active), Avalon U5 (active).
IMO and IME, absolute polarity is not distinguishable (unless clipping on an asymmetrical amplifier is causing other effects).
There is nothing wrong with any of the systems I have experimented on either, nor is there anything wrong with my lab test setup which is designed for these types of comparisons.
Here's some food for thought... if (absolute) polarity was that important, then each half of a symmetrical waveform would sound different. They just don't. The proof of this is to invert the signal of a pure sine wave and listen to the inverted versus non-inverted tone. There are no differences unless there are gross distortions due to (REALLY) poor amplifier design.
In a symmetrical waveform, there is nothing to be heard when reversing the polarity. On a music signal, even my "I have no highs left" boss can hear the difference - on his guitar rig no less. If you aren't hearing it, there's a problem with the system, or you are not listening.
I can assure you there is no problem with my hearing or the systems.
You are (IMO) confusing absolute polarity with relative polarity, and acoustic interactions (with an amplified acoustic instrument or relative to a PA) rather than a more open loop condition such as w/ EB or even recording. With your monitor example, that's a closed loop condition because the microphone is there to close the loop and amplify the source sound again.
I suggest that anyone out there try reversing the polarity of their speaker cabinet on their bass rig and listen to the difference. Generally there will be no clear difference or preference whatsoever. I have done enough testing to be confident of the results.
Anyone used a Radial Bassbone's DI? I'll be using it this Saturday for the first time. I assume it will be better than the DI off my Mpulse600 head.
I own a Radial shaper.. woulnd't spend the extra again... not enough difference
Def. go with the heads DI...make yourself familiar with all of the features...heck I'm still learning some myself.. Wi ill say Im currently using a Genz shuttle 6.0...while the DI does the trick it isnt the quietest Ive used.
For quietest operation, and generally (though not always) the most useful signal for the FOH engineer, use the pre eq position. This eliminates a lot of additional electronics that are not necessary for your basic DI signal. It will also eliminate some noise (hiss) that all electronics generate.
This applies to all amps in general.
.....guess what happened on Sunday?.......Looks like my direct out on my SWR is having some issues, unfortunately..
I think I'm going to switch to a DI pre-head going forward just in case...
And you will experience the same thing when you have a problem with the DI... your solution is a little bit like throwing the baby out with the bath water eh?