1. Please take 30 seconds to register your free account to remove most ads, post topics, make friends, earn reward points at our store, and more!  
    TalkBass.com has been uniting the low end since 1998.  Join us! :)

Binding on the Body?

Discussion in 'Basses [BG]' started by Blu bro, Jul 11, 2018.

  1. Always binding if its an option

    8 vote(s)
  2. Dont care at all- as long as it plays well

    5 vote(s)
  3. Most definitely not

    1 vote(s)
  4. Carrots- lots of carrots

    3 vote(s)
  1. Blu bro

    Blu bro

    Mar 1, 2012
    I try really hard not to judge a bass purely by its cosmetics. But I just cant get over binding on the body of a bass- on the neck I quiet like it. But just cant get behind it on the body (and feel its slightly uncomfortable).

    One day this may change (and I hope it does) as I want to only judge a musical instrument by how it plays and sounds- but I cant help but fall into the trap of listening with my eyes.

    Am I alone? what is the general consensus?
  2. juancaminos

    juancaminos Supporting Member

    May 30, 2003
    USA, Phoenix, AZ
    I'm alright with it. It does depend on the bass I guess. Aerodyne, hollow bodies, Rickenbacker, etc.
  3. BassholeKI


    Feb 10, 2017
    I agree it depends on the bass.

    My ~1970 Rivoli (EA-260 really) has a bound body, and it wouldn't look as good if it were plain.
    RBrownBass and Blu bro like this.
  4. scubaduba

    scubaduba Moderator Staff Member Supporting Member

    Dec 23, 2003
    Yes. I like. A lot. And with the body contour you'd never know it had a binding while playing.
    E7F18F5F-37EE-4312-8920-51E5398A70BF. ECD01C04-6F95-4683-9572-588D8318195F.
    kohanmike, Mildew Jones and jd56hawk like this.
  5. murmur70


    May 3, 2017
    As others have said it depends on the bass. I have a Fender Starcaster that is bound. Aerodynamic looks cool with binding. I have seen a 51 p style someone on here has that is pretty sweet looking as well.
  6. B-Mac

    B-Mac Sorting Things Out Supporting Member

    Mandatory on an Archtop
  7. SpazzTheBassist


    Jun 20, 2006
    I like it on my Destroyer

    Wademeister63 likes this.
  8. 2saddleslab

    2saddleslab Supporting Member

    May 30, 2003
    I was born bound for binding.
    48F084D0-19D2-414A-A063-5391A76D5AF8. 471B51EF-14F3-4FB3-AE93-15120CEED9B5. 9F72B30F-E815-4421-AF25-19A8BC60EDEE. 6CACDA1A-EFB2-43B3-A54C-28C4E83502AD.
    GrooverMcTube, dabbler and Templar like this.
  9. jd56hawk


    Sep 12, 2011
    The Garden State
    Not counting hollow bodies, Rickenbackers and Les Paul type basses, I think it's really nice on this.
    Wouldn't have it any other way.
    Blu bro likes this.
  10. I don't have a problem with it.


    2saddleslab likes this.
  11. dabbler


    Aug 17, 2007
    Bowie, MD

    2saddleslab likes this.
  12. JGR

    JGR The "G" is for Gustav Supporting Member Commercial User

    Jun 29, 2006
    President, CEO, CFO, CIO, Chief Engineer, Technician, Janitor - Reiner Amplification
    2saddleslab and Mildew Jones like this.
  13. BassholeKI


    Feb 10, 2017
    Certain basses/body styles absolutely call for it.
  14. elgranluis


    Feb 14, 2003
    El paso, TX
    I love binding but I have to agree that it completely depends on the bass .

    A ric 4003 is great with binding , a 4003s is even better without ! Lol !
  15. Love the look, ain’t the most comfortable. But seeing as I have had a Rick 4003 since about 1991, I guess I don’t mind it much. I don’t seek it out either.
  16. Oh, so I guess that means I should vote carrots. Which I did.

Share This Page