• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Bowing suggestion

Sep 24, 2011
1,335
318
Hi all

tempo is 3/2 - for the legato bars, what is best way to play, as one bow or try down/up, eg. change after first 3 bars??
Thanks in advance Capture.JPG
 
Hi all

tempo is 3/2 - for the legato bars, what is best way to play, as one bow or try down/up, eg. change after first 3 bars??
Thanks in advanceView attachment 967201
Oscar Zimmerman bowed it this way in the 36 Overtures book.
IMG_20161011_200544-01.jpeg

Might be excessive. Depends on the tempo and how big the section is playing.
I would say break the slur only once when it leaps up each time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: csrund
Always kind of fun to check NY Phil digital archives. Much of their music library is scanned and it goes way back. Wish more orchestras did this.

There were two scores with parts for Egmont.

Under Andre Kostelanetz, it was bowed exactly as per Zimmerman.

New York Philharmonic: Viewer

Under Leonard Bernstein, each was broken in two, both starting up/ending down.

New York Philharmonic: Viewer

Interesting that in both versions, the cellos bow identical to the bass when doubling, but when alone they vary.

PS Just click the pages to turn.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Andy Mopley
Great links, thanks Ben, did not know they existed.
PS - I find bard 162 and 163 a little tricky if the conductor is waving his/her arms around like crazy - prefer to count it in my own head - you mess up there and you better be listening to the F note coming from the wind section..:-)
 
Thanks csrund - where would we be without Youtube? :-) - perhaps a topic onto itself, in terms of its pedagogic use.
On another topic, the more of these I watch, the more I question the need to have the bow placed 1/2 way between the end of the fingerboard and the bridge, as suggested by some. In both videos, the bow is certainly closer to the fingerboard, which I find gives a better tone quality, generally. But I do know and appreciate that every piece calls for different bow placement.
 
Watching a particular performance of an orchestra play shouldn't lead you to think that they chose the bowing to suit the occasion of this conductor and tempo. They are probably just playing the bowing that was there from long ago. Trying to play the original articulation might work at Thielemann's tempo, but not Bernstein's. So if it isn't causing problems, it is unlikely they will change it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: csrund
Thanks csrund - where would we be without Youtube? :) - perhaps a topic onto itself, in terms of its pedagogic use.
On another topic, the more of these I watch, the more I question the need to have the bow placed 1/2 way between the end of the fingerboard and the bridge, as suggested by some. In both videos, the bow is certainly closer to the fingerboard, which I find gives a better tone quality, generally. But I do know and appreciate that every piece calls for different bow placement.

The bow placement you observe in the videos is probably more of a stylistic difference with the European players. My prof at IU, Larry Hurst, demonstrated their style of playing for me in a lesson once. They tend to use a lighter touch and generate volume with longer, faster strokes, rather than pressure into the string. It produces a huge sound, but some people observe that it's less focused. I'm no expert on the subject, but that's what I recall him teaching me about it.

Cheers!