• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Breaking News!

thanks...what a shocking way to return ey?

well..its an instrument i rather see a collector have, not someone like me thats using it in the 3 bands that im in being rather paranoid about destroying it..i know its not something thats highly collectable...but its something someone else would appreciate more than me..that and i lust for either a stingray or a jazz something hardcore
 
The_Owl said:
The green, owned by Stu Hamm one?
yup
NOISE! said:
Why not a lakeland or something like it, so you can have both?
because i dont know of anywhere where i can try a lakaland and im not buying blind
FireAarro said:
Don't let it go :eek:

Try a different bass first, see if you still want to sell it.
i have, Either a Stingray or an American Deluxe Jazz
 
well we'll see how much i get for the kubicki..if i get enough ill be spendin the day in sydney seein what i come across....

or ill be buying a new stingray from bass central in the us, i already got a quite for $1000us for a new one :D

this is what id looooooovvvveeeee..a lovely beat up '72 jazz
EX390_001.jpg

Link Removed
Invalid Link Removed
 
So long as you've thought this decision out thoroughly and ruminated it over and over again, put your Kubicki in a locked closet for a week or 2 and realized you didn't miss it, etc. it's all good.

Because once you sell it, you can't take it back. And we know how much that bass meant to you.

No regrets, man.

I'm sure others may say that you should keep the Kubicki and get a beater bass for your gigs, but if money's that tight by you (and knowing how expensive getting many basses is in Australia) and you have no recourse but to sell it to finance a more workingman's bass, then there's no stopping you.
 

Latest posts