When you do take it to a luthier, have them check out the adjusters. It looks like they are kind off loose allowing the bridge to lean even more.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
If you look at the first picture you can see it is slanted toward the fingerboard (you can see the end of the fingerboard.)It appears that most of the comments here have given advice on how to persuade the bridge slant towards the tailpiece, which is what most of us need to do from time to time. OP's very first photo shows the opposite, that the bridge was already slanted (too much) toward the tailpiece... so most of the advice is wrong.
The bridge will not fall over in either direction. It won't fall toward the neck, because it's slanted the other way, and it won't fall toward the tailpiece, because the afterlengths won't let it. However, it might just break!
As @KUNGfuSHERIFF points out, it appears from the "after" photos that correcting the bridge's slant results in poor contact of bridge feet to the bass's top. To me, that indicates that the adjusters are poorly installed or that the entire bridge needs to be replaced.
If you look at the first picture you can see it is slanted toward the fingerboard (you can see the end of the fingerboard.)
I think some confusion is arising because the first and third photos are upside-down, or at least they're showing upside-down in my browser.
I had posted “could the feet be backwards?” Could the whole bridge be backwards? I’m not seeing anything in the provided pics that tell me either way. The string slot widths leave it ambiguous to me. Anyone else look at that?
Please don't install discarded British Saxophone parts on American Double Basses.