• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Build #3: "The Bird"

So, this sickness just continues to get out of hand. :meh:
I've kind of had this planned for a couple years now, it originally popped up in one of my other build threads so now that build #1 and build #2 have basically come to a close (aside from sorting out some minor setup things), it's time to start taking another look at this one. Thus, we need a post placeholder, and here it is! :woot:

The Bird -
In my collection, I own a 90s B.C Rich Warlock Platinum Series -
Warlock.jpg
My wife bought this bass for me as an anniversary gift one year. It was the display model and has a decent sized dent in the face of that beautiful trans-blue burst, thus we got it at a steal. Her favorite color is blue, so that helped. It is the model with the "Widow" headstock, making it more sought after (and more metal if you ask me).
I also have this pretty cool looking B.C. Rich Mockingbird MKII -
Mockingbird Quilt.jpg
It's one of those less than desirable models from here recently with the quilted maple top. I'm not sure if the top is one of those fake prints or if it's just a mega-thin laminate. This one has the "Tombstone" headstock on it. I paid cash for it from a local music store that cuts crazy deals for cash customers.

Get To The Point (See What I Did There? ) -
Anyways, I told you that story so I could tell you this one. The "collection" needs an Ironbird to complete the pointy bass trifecta! :woot:
I've looked at original Ironbirds and IF you can even find one, they sell fast and go for stupid prices. So, let's just build one. First we need a plan, so I went to AutoCAD and threw this together -
The Bird V1.JPG


We'll go reverse standard headstock on this one, because I currently do not own a reverse headstock bass. I try to build things I don't have, and reverse headstock fits the bill here. ;) I'm also not a fan of the original Ironbird headstock, so we'll just use the standard B.C. Rich headstock, because more pointy anyways! :woot:

Things To Ponder -
I'm still debating what bridge I want to use, which will dictate the design a little around that area. The Ironbird basically has a little "block" hanging off the rear that the bridge mounts to. Using a hardtail bridge it would fit just in that block. I'm considering using a tremolo, which may dictate a larger block, depending on which tremolo I choose. And yes, I know, bass tremolos are useless. That doesn't mean I don't want one. :smug:
I'm still playing with the headstock a bit. Typically, those late 80s / early 90s pointy hair metal basses had some horrible string angles after the nut. All the B.C. Rich, Jackson, Charvel "hockey stick" headstocks shared that same basic layout. You get one string pulling straight and the other three are all willy-nilly. The question becomes, do I want to "rotate" the whole thing so that the straight-pull string is the D? Or do I just leave it alone and not care? There's literally thousands of basses built like that and it's not really a problem, so maybe I just don't care.
I also straightened up a few of the body lines. The original design had a more curved line from the bridge section down -
Screenshot 2022-03-23 114901.jpg
And also had more of a weird little "point" at the upper rear tip -
Screenshot 2022-03-23 114816.jpg
I've eliminated those and just gone more "straight". I've also rounded off the points a bit more, just to make building easier. It also has the added benefit of making my design "less original" and less likely to obtain a "cease and desist". :roflmao:
No, I do not plan on ever selling it, so I know it doesn't matter.

Anyway, everything else is pretty typical here. We're gonna go 24-fret, 34" scale length, 4 string. I'm still not sold on the pickup configuration, because I already own a double-P bass. But the problem there is, I already own a P-J, I already own a double-P, I already own a dual humbucker / soapbar. I'm kind of out of setups I don't already have covered. About the only thing I don't own is a double-J and honestly, I don't really like that sound anyways. So I don't know yet.

Let's Talk Finish -
So there's a really REALLY big part of me that wants to do this thing in neon yellow with black/yellow taxi-cab checkers on the sides. Something similar to this -
DSCI0060.jpg
Let's be honest here, we're building an 80s hair metal bass and what's more 80s hair metal that neon and taxi-cab checkers? :roflmao:
There's also a smaller part of me that wants to try a crackle finish, because I don't own one and I've never tried it.
Either way, it means we don't need super fancy high end woods here. If we're gonna paint it anyways, basswood/ash/alder is fine as far as I'm concerned.

So there you have it, a design, a concept, a plan. This is how we'll give 'em all the bird! :smug: :cool:
Stay tuned as this start moving forward. Right now this is just a placeholder. I haven't even begun gathering wood yet. We're waiting on the budget. I may or may not join the "Great Guitar Build-Off 2022" in the community build category (which is NOT part of the actual judged competition), but if I do this will be the build. GGBO22 timeframe is right now through the end of October I think.
 
Last edited:
Would it be easy or hard to do on the drawing?
Fairly easy really. I just grab all those lines and "rotate" from a given point until I don't hate it. :roflmao:

I mean, TBH, I don't mind the headstock the way it is. It doesn't bother me what-so-ever. In fact, to me it screams 80s hair metal. But I know there's a group of individuals who cringe at crooked string pulls. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beej
Sounds like a fun project, Tim. Maybe consider double MM pups? You can throw series/parallel/single switches in there for tons of variety and they sound pretty RAWK for sure. :thumbsup:
Yeah, I'm considering something along those lines. I started poking around at double-J sound clips and maybe I don't hate it. So double-J may still be an option. I thought about maybe a pair of dual coils with coil splits on each. Or maybe the double-MM is another option. But I know we're NOT doing P/J! I've got like 3 or 4 of those already! :roflmao:
 
Yeah, I'm considering something along those lines. I started poking around at double-J sound clips and maybe I don't hate it. So double-J may still be an option. I thought about maybe a pair of dual coils with coil splits on each. Or maybe the double-MM is another option. But I know we're NOT doing P/J! I've got like 3 or 4 of those already! :roflmao:

Yeah, I have one P/J but I never play that bass any more... but I love that sound. Maybe I'll use that configuration in my next build. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: TerribleTim68
I'm a sucker for oddly shaped basses, and this one hits the spot. I think the block shape behind the bridge could work very well with a tailpiece, like a Billy-Bo bass. I don't know if that fits the whole hair metal theme, though.

Awesome project, I'll be following along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TerribleTim68
I like the reverse headstock, I think it suits the design.
I also like that it looks like you're going with a dual split P pickup config. If I may, I'd recommend the humble Dimarzio Model P for this project. I once had a P bass that I modded for a second P bridge pickup, and had it outfitted with two Model Ps at one point. It was gnaaaarly as all heck and the sound would definitely suit the body shape. Pretty sure I would have been using 500k pots and a 0.1u cap.

If you don't want to go with the dual-P setup, maybe Thunderbird pickups? Or something like Lace Alumitones, or maybe hot guitar humbuckers or something?

Re finish, crackled yellow over black. Definitely. :p
 
Last edited:
Sweet!!!

I vote for crackle finish, FWIW.
I think my concern regarding the crackle is, similar to a swirl, the crackle does what the crackle wants. There's less control over "how" it cracks, so I feel like there's a high risk of not getting a desired result and sanding it back off. I've watched a TON of videos from "Guitar Guts", he has done a lot of crackles, and even he says it's tough. There's a lot of variation out there, from the large crackle -
download.jpg oyTq8jL.png
to the very small, tight crackle -
hqdefault.jpg
I'm not set up to do it from a spray gun, so we'd be talking the Montana spray cans, which seem to give a much smaller, tight crackle. And my problem is, I prefer the larger crackle. Ideally, you'd want a very bright neon base coat and a very large black crackle top coat like the first two pics. I'm just not convinced I'm set up to get that result.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nuage420
One thing I would consider is to try to get the forward strap button as close as possible to the 12th fret. Try moving the top horn forward a little bit.
Yes, I'm aware of the "neck dive" possibility here, like pretty much every other B.C. Rich design. :p
But I really don't want to start altering the design just for that and wind up with some wonky looking thing that still doesn't solve it. I'm fairly sure it won't be any worse than my Mockingbird or my Warlock or my Ibanez Destroyer or my Thunderbird. :D
 

Latest posts