TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

I was thinking about the hair back then, and you're right! Butch cats, nothing touching the ears, YUP! This wig REALLY made a difference! Lol!Had to laugh because I actually bought a "Beatle Wig" in 1964 and I did pay $4.98 for it, which was pretty expensive back then. A local store got in a couple of shipments of them. You had to brush it a lot to get it into a shape that would actually look like a Beatle's haircut. You have to remember that, back in the early 60's, no one had long hair. Crew-cuts, flat-tops, and all around just short hair you could part on one side were the norm. Hair didn't even touch your ears let alone cover them.
I actually probably still have that around somewhere in my garage. I still have some 45's from back then tooincluding "I Want to Hold Your Hand" and a number of others.
I'm amazed at how infatuated apparently most Americans are with the Beatles. As a Brit born in the 60's the last thing I want to hear (or worse, have to play) is more Beatles.
You are so right. Just listen to Maxwell Silver Hammer. It is George on the Bass VI (I believe) and is classic tuba.You can play Beatles on Tuba.
And then here's me with actual long hair and sideburn chops in about 1972I was thinking about the hair back then, and you're right! Butch cats, nothing touching the ears, YUP! This wig REALLY made a difference! Lol!
VERY happenin' Man!And then here's me with actual long hair and sideburn chops in about 1972View attachment 5018665 while touring with a night club group.
And then here's me with actual long hair and sideburn chops in about 1972View attachment 5018665 while touring with a night club group.