• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join free Log in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass Concertos:Koussevitzky vs. Dragonetti?

#3
Ive done the Scarlatti sonatas, Eccles,along with other less notable pieces.
Currently working on the Chanson Triste by Koussevitzky, Romance from Lieutenant Kije by Prokofiev, Vivaldi violin concerto in G minor,and parts of various Bach cello suites(a constant work in progress).
I'm also open to any suggestions, but these two pieces to me seem to be the next step for a piece to work on long term and something pretty challenging that might even be a little out of my range at this point.
 
#4
Eli_Upright12 said:
I'm gonna get a concerto to start working on and hopefully play in the future, which one of these two do prefer or think is a better piece?
Click to expand...
Well, if you are about to start I would say Dragonetti. My maine reason is that the Dragonetti will teach more than the Koussevitzky will. It will build more "chops" so to speak. And, help you with harmonics across the fingerboard and beyond.

I think the Koussevitzky is a little harder. Not due to tough passages, but due to the expression factor. Not that you can't be expressive in the Dragonetti.
 
#5
mcnaire2004 said:
Well, if you are about to start I would say Dragonetti. My maine reason is that the Dragonetti will teach more than the Koussevitzky will. It will build more "chops" so to speak. And, help you with harmonics across the fingerboard and beyond.

I think the Koussevitzky is a little harder. Not due to tough passages, but due to the expression factor. Not that you can't be expressive in the Dragonetti.
Click to expand...

Does the Dragonetti have some off the fingerboard harmonics? I watched youtube videos and thought I saw some high up harmonics, but I sort of like the Koussevitzky better but maybe since Im already playing one Koussevitzky piece I'll try something different.
 
#6
Dragonetti's not the most musically satisfying piece, but it does sound like a better fit with everything else you've worked up to so far. Think of the Dragonetti as an etude, if anything. I think the Dragonetti can help prepare you for the Koussevitzky, which is more challenging and certainly more satisfying. You will ultimately want to have the Koussevitzky in your back pocket for when you need a concerto (such as auditions), and learning it right the first time around will save you time later.

That said, do whatever your teacher recommends.
 
#7
PaulCannon said:
Dragonetti's not the most musically satisfying piece, but it does sound like a better fit with everything else you've worked up to so far. Think of the Dragonetti as an etude, if anything. I think the Dragonetti can help prepare you for the Koussevitzky, which is more challenging and certainly more satisfying. You will ultimately want to have the Koussevitzky in your back pocket for when you need a concerto (such as auditions), and learning it right the first time around will save you time later.

That said, do whatever your teacher recommends.
Click to expand...

Thank you thats exactly what I was hoping some one would say about one of the pieces, I really want to push my playing to the next level and even if I can't play one of these pieces straight through I want to have something that will require improved skill. The dragonetti's first movement is a little faster right?
 
#8
Eli_Upright12 said:
Thank you thats exactly what I was hoping some one would say about one of the pieces, I really want to push my playing to the next level and even if I can't play one of these pieces straight through I want to have something that will require improved skill. The dragonetti's first movement is a little faster right?
Click to expand...

The first movement is kindof fast. I'd say around 120bpms for the quarter note.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom
Back