• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Convince me I should move to a 5-string

I have been a 4-string player but lately have been considering moving to a 5-string. Can someone give me a solid list of pros and cons of making the move?


I really can't think of a con...

Pro's are the added range... the ease of playability...


THe most important thing to me is you have to want to play a 5'r... mine wasn't so much a choice I picked one up and loved it... it came natural to me.. I still have a 4 string.. always will but I pretty much allways play 5 now
 
I was a 4-string player for 25 years when I got a 6-string FL. Depending on how you look at and play your instrument, that low B can be a real distraction; especially after a long period of being used that that low E being what and where it is.

String spacing is often a bit tighter on a 5-stringer, which I don't particularly care for, but others may find that to be a benefit.

Certain types of music really benefit from a low B, while others don't need much from it except a spice here and there. So, consider that and go try some out. You may find the low B to be very distracting, or it may seem to be no problem at all for you.
 
Have you ever played a 5 string? Do you play music that calls for a low B? No one can convince you to move to a five string but trying one will either move you or it won't. I'm just the opposite, I've gone from a five string Lakland 01 to a 7 string Conklin GT-7 to a Yamaha TRB-1006 and am now convinced that a 5 string is more appropriate for both my style of playing and the various genres I play.
 
In my opinion, moving on a 5 strings it just depend from want you wanna do, the low B add you more way to to extend groove in your low tone section.
A good suggestion it's just try it a cheap one and see if you like the idea of the low B and if it fit good in your playing style.
Don't move on it just because rumors etc etc, bets way to understand if you like it's just try it for a small period of time, that's it.
A lot of player play great low bass grooves also just with the regular 4, other people like to use the D tuner and other are just feel comfortable with the 5 strings.
So just try it and see how you feel with it ;-)
Cheers. Enrico
YouTube
WebSite
 
So much more flexibility!

Range (the lower notes)

Timbre choices (playing in the upper frets of the B string instead of on the E or A strings for the same notes, for fat, fat timbre, and then you can shift downward for contrast)

Hand positioning (again, the upper range of that B string will allow you to maintain positioning)

Ability to play low E on the B string and ghost the notes (this is SUPER-Fat, like a bass drum with centered pitch, and applies all the way down to low C, to boot!)

I had trouble with the transition at first, and ergonomics (body size/shape; string spacing; neck dimensions; weight) seem to become more important than with a 4, but I now hardly play 4 at all - in fact I'm about to sell 2 of my three 4-string basses.
 
All of the above.

We play a lot of Real Book songs in F and Bb. Sitting on the low F on "Green Onions" was killing me. Bought a Yamaha 5er on TB classifieds for short money and love it -- it's just right for all purposes for me.

The switch to 5 isn't hard if you apply yourself.
 
Pros- more range

Cons- cost more for a set of strings, and a little bit more weight.

I personally play a 6 string bass most of the time, but if you aren't gonna use the whole range it's not necessary. I enjoy using a 4 string more just because I like the playability of a 4 more. If you need the lower range but don't really ever use the upper frets on your G string then it might be a better option to get heavier gauge strings and tune BEAD. You will need to have your nut slots widened for the larger strings and a set up done if you go that route.
 
I've played mostly 5-ers for the last 20 years, but have always kept a 4 or two around. Lately I'm finding myself spending more time on the 4-banger.

All I can do is relate my experience--when I bought my first 5, it was because my hands seemed to "want" that extra low string there. I found myself reaching for it even though it wasn't there and I'd never had a lower string. So I decided I was ready, and I was--though it took a little getting used to. The standard transitional problems all happened--I was used to that lowest string being an E, and so I'd mistakenly play a low D when what I wanted was a G--that sort of thing. I got over that relatively quickly.

What I didn't realize until my latest reinfatuation with the 4-string is that it's a lot harder to keep all the strings quiet on a 5. Muting is definitely one place where the 4 has an advantage. And the 4's out there still seem to have a better slap sound, IMHO.

So my experience is that having both is the best. When I've got a super-fast funk tune where I'm slapping like crazy, I use the 4. My main straight-ahead playing axe is a 5. I'd buy good-quality used and see if you like it, and if not you can sell it without taking a huge loss.
 
I'm struggling with this (again) right now. I played a 5 exclusively for years. I decided I didn't really need it, and wanted to try a 4 again. It seems like a play better on a 4. The neck feels nice. I sold my 5 so there would be no going back so to speak.

For the most part, I don't think you NEED a 5, even if the original version used a B string. Nothing wrong with an octave up. I think my lines/improv sounds better when I go up instead of down. That might just be me, who knows. Sometimes, a low groove really works.

I prefer the playability of a 4 string. No one I play with says I must have a 5 to play with them. I kind of want to go away from my active 4/5 phase and go to a simple passive 4 string jazz. Yet....part of me thinks a 5 string has all the 4 stuff covered with the option of what a 5 string offers...except dealing with the wider neck all the time.

You could have both. Many people do. For me, I really only want to use 1 bass on a gig. I don't like to change mid-set.
 
I've played mostly 5-ers for the last 20 years, but have always kept a 4 or two around. Lately I'm finding myself spending more time on the 4-banger.

All I can do is relate my experience--when I bought my first 5, it was because my hands seemed to "want" that extra low string there. I found myself reaching for it even though it wasn't there and I'd never had a lower string. So I decided I was ready, and I was--though it took a little getting used to. The standard transitional problems all happened--I was used to that lowest string being an E, and so I'd mistakenly play a low D when what I wanted was a G--that sort of thing. I got over that relatively quickly.

What I didn't realize until my latest reinfatuation with the 4-string is that it's a lot harder to keep all the strings quiet on a 5. Muting is definitely one place where the 4 has an advantage. And the 4's out there still seem to have a better slap sound, IMHO.

So my experience is that having both is the best. When I've got a super-fast funk tune where I'm slapping like crazy, I use the 4. My main straight-ahead playing axe is a 5. I'd buy good-quality used and see if you like it, and if not you can sell it without taking a huge loss.

Fair point about the muting...my first effort to play a 5 foundered on that issue. But I've converted to a "floating thumb" technique most of the time, which has sorted this out quite a bit, and I'm now focusing more on left-hand muting as well.