Second sentence of the last paragraph. He said that he does not have any involvement in the booking or know if there was or was not a contract.
I missed that, thanks.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Second sentence of the last paragraph. He said that he does not have any involvement in the booking or know if there was or was not a contract.
That does not mean he cannot find out, but then, that might cut into his insulting the intelligence of the responders.Second sentence of the last paragraph. He said that he does not have any involvement in the booking or know if there was or was not a contract.
That does not mean he cannot find out, but then, that might cut into his insulting the intelligence of the responders.
Interesting, considering the OP's posts have expressed an almost pompous reaction to questioning his (and his friend's) legal knowledge, even though his post clearly shows that his legal understanding of the situation is thoroughly lacking.
I'm not sure I can go along with hsech, though. He says "titty babies" as though it's a bad thing.![]()
Save yourself the aggrevation and let it go. Anybody suggesting a 100K lawsuit is an idiot.
If it is deemed beneficial to our cause, I can always air it on CL, in the future. I thus welcome everyone's take on this.
As for playing music past 50, I passed that milestone a few years back and don't see any need to stop now.
BassCliff
Second sentence of the last paragraph. He said that he does not have any involvement in the booking or know if there was or was not a contract.
If the venue is going to charge a cover, that is something that should have been communicated to your group well ahead of time.
According to your numbers from earlier on, that means they owe you $700 bucks. Not a ton of money when you split it amongst all the members in the band, but as you said it the precedence that is important.
I don't know about anyone else, but I was thinking more like asking the BL "hey, did we get paid what we were promised, or were we supposed to get part of that door?" That would pretty much cover it. The OP wanted everyone's "take." It seems like most everyone would have more of a "take" on what actually happened if they knew what actually happened.So, first, I didn't say that he couldn't meet demands about a possible contract. For all I know he's requesting copies in triplicate with a pdf for easy posting, as we speak. IMO, that someone, who is demanding that another forum member produce evidence or documentation in a thread, expects anything more than a whiff of a fart sent in their general direction surprises me a little...but that's just me.
The OP wanted everyone's "take." It seems like most everyone would have more of a "take" on what actually happened if they knew what actually happened.