• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Define a quality bass guitar.

I'll take a crack at it:

"Good" quality bass: sturdy components, stable neck that isn't in need of constant adjustments, reliable well soldered/mounted electronics, and body-neck pairing that "agree" with each other

"Decent" quality bass: has attributes of the "good" quality bass to a lesser extent

"Poor/bad" quality bass: unstable neck and/or hardware, unreliable and/or poorly soldered electronics, woods or body/neck materials that don't get along (unpleasing resonance/vibration/dead spots)

I suppose a "decent" or "poor" quality bass could be improved with a neck or hardware swap, and electronics can always be upgraded - so there's a lot of grey area here.

The rest is a matter of opinion though. How does it feel to YOU? How does it sound to YOU? Does it inspire you to play? That's what matters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KaraQ and marchone
[another random rant]
I've read that dead spots are "pot luck" because of the variability of wood, even on the elite, small volume brands (that's what I read), even neck-throughs. So how many thousands of dollars would I have to pay to get *someone else* to try out enough necks - with their logo on it - to get a good one, custom chosen?

No, I'll do that myself too; I'll take my chances with Warmoth, Allparts, etc. Not ashamed of them in the slightest.
[end]

No need to try a million necks, the work has been done for you. If you want a neck without dead spots you have to get rid of the headstock. Fender figured this out decades ago. Fender made the prototype but didn't think it would sell. Don't think they were wrong either since nobody else started doing it for 10-15 years after their prototype. Even today, not a lot of folks clamoring for headless basses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marchone
I see threads here frequently saying this brand is garbage, or that brand only made a few good basses and you have to try them all to find a good one.

Put into words what a good bass is.

Do the same for a decent bass.

Now describe a bad bass.

If you can, articulate what is garbage, and what is not.

Try hard to leave out unadulterated opinion and subjectivity.

Be objective.

I submit it is in the hands and mind of the player.

Blind taste tests in the wine world have upset many apple carts and embarrassed many professional sommeliers. I lived tangentially as a chef in that world. You can’t quantify opinion.

A blindfolded test of top bass makers would be the end-all to this conversation.

A good bass allows me the opportunity to fully express my art without limiting me made from quality components and assembled well, with good fit and finish. My Fender PJ fits the bill.

A decent bass is one that offers the above, but maybe doesn’t sound quite as good, maybe fit and finish not quite as good. My Son’s mid 90s Fender MIN Jazz would be a good example, until we upgraded the pickups. Then it became a good bass. A surprisingly good bass.

A bad bass can be bad due to manufacture deficiency, poor components, assembly fit and finish errors, cheap electronics, intonation issues, and or limits my artistic expression. That would be my first bass, a no-name Japanese 60s bass. I could barely play the thing. It was everything I listed above and them some. If was so bad nobody would need an A-B test on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KaraQ and marchone
[sarcasm]
  • A bass is only quality if it's got the right mark on the headstock
  • It has to be the expensive version of a FSO (Fender-shaped object)
  • Gotta be made in 'Murica
  • Must be old enough to have had a mid-life crisis
  • Tort
[/sarcasm]

For everyone's consideration: Are there any bad basses anymore?

A "good" bass is one that gets you playing. A "quality" bass is one that other people respect for whatever reason - often based upon brand perception and reputation, sometimes based on marketing and endorsements. (It's a subjective matter these days, which is why "quality" means something different to everyone you'll ask. It's also why discussions like this gain traction on Talkbass.) These two concepts are orthogonal, and thus completely unrelated.

It becomes a trick of psychology. Something being "quality" implies that the rest isn't, and after a certain base level these value judgements are based on emotion and nebulous ideas. That's why if you ask a question like this, you won't get straight answers from the people who define it.

"Quality" is subjective. "Good" gets you playing. You are correct in saying that the player matters far more than the instrument itself.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if Robert Pirsig played bass....??

[sarcasm]
  • A bass is only quality if it's got the right mark on the headstock
  • It has to be the expensive version of a FSO (Fender-shaped object)
  • Gotta be made in 'Murica
  • Must be old enough to have had a mid-life crisis
  • Tort
[/sarcasm]

For everyone's consideration: Are there any bad basses anymore?

A "good" bass is one that gets you playing. A "quality" bass is one that other people respect for whatever reason - often based upon brand perception and reputation, sometimes based on marketing and endorsements. (It's a subjective matter these days, which is why "quality" means something different to everyone you'll ask. It's also why discussions like this gain traction on Talkbass.) These two concepts are orthogonal, and thus completely unrelated.

It become a trick of psychology. Something being "quality" implies that the rest isn't, and after a certain base level these value judgements are based on emotion and nebulous ideas. That's why if you ask a question like this, you won't get straight answers from the people who define it.

"Quality" is subjective. "Good" gets you playing. You are correct in saying that the player matters far more than the instrument itself.
A professor of philosophy drove himself nuts viewing the word “quality” as many view the word “vintage”.

He wrote a book about it which sold pretty well.

Anyone who referenced Pirsig is on it. It’s impossible.

That’s why this thread is going in circles.

Why get a Nash, Lull, Lakland, etc. Fender replica when you can get a Fender?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Geri O
Threads like this puzzle me.

Exactly what are you hoping to get at, OP? Do you think people are going to come here and rationally, dispassionately debate something as subjective as "quality," knowing that a dozen other posters are going to pounce on them and point out why they're wrong?

A "quality" bass is a bass that a player can play well. And different players look for different things, so I doubt there's a rational answer.
That seems like a completely rational answer.
 
"Good" and "bad" are subjective terms. You're asking what a good bass is, but asking us to be objective. "Quality" is a relative term.

You said you're a chef, that's like asking: "what is a good dish and what is a bad dish, but be objective with your answer".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Picton and marchone
there is a sliding scale - not a "yes or no" system for finding the marks of quality.

marks of quality:

neck wood is properly seasoned, even, not showing any signs of warping. truss rod works as intended. neck can be dialed in from perfectly flat, to .010 relief, to more if needed. *the more the neck holds adjustment through weather changes, the better it is. this is key for ease of ownership, and reliability. this makes something a workhorse.

frets, though easily touched up, tell you a lot about the factory it left. they should be properly leveled, even, and *NOT BE SHARP AT THE ENDS OF THE FRETBOARD* (I'm looking at you, fender!!). good example is kiesel (carvin) - i've never seen an instrument from them that did not have objectively perfect frets.

pickups don't make any unusual sounds. (single coil hum, even on a high-priced bass, is just a part of single-coils.) Pickups sound full and even across strings.

the tone itself, while subjective, needs to be musical. generally on a bass that means fullness in the low register, note clarity in the mids, and crispness in the treble. from a vintage P to a brand new 6 string fodera, the principles remain the same.

fancy woods are a mark of "more expensive," and in many cases nicer looking (subjective) and therefore "higher quality." obviously wishbass could buy an expensive top wood and make a bass, but generally the highest grade figured top woods get put to good use, by the simple nature that they are very expensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marchone