You can ask for an objective answer to a subjective question, if you want. You’ll get lots of subjective answers.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Be objective.
[another random rant]
I've read that dead spots are "pot luck" because of the variability of wood, even on the elite, small volume brands (that's what I read), even neck-throughs. So how many thousands of dollars would I have to pay to get *someone else* to try out enough necks - with their logo on it - to get a good one, custom chosen?
No, I'll do that myself too; I'll take my chances with Warmoth, Allparts, etc. Not ashamed of them in the slightest.
[end]
I see threads here frequently saying this brand is garbage, or that brand only made a few good basses and you have to try them all to find a good one.
Put into words what a good bass is.
Do the same for a decent bass.
Now describe a bad bass.
If you can, articulate what is garbage, and what is not.
Try hard to leave out unadulterated opinion and subjectivity.
Be objective.
I submit it is in the hands and mind of the player.
Blind taste tests in the wine world have upset many apple carts and embarrassed many professional sommeliers. I lived tangentially as a chef in that world. You can’t quantify opinion.
A blindfolded test of top bass makers would be the end-all to this conversation.
I wonder if Robert Pirsig played bass....??
[sarcasm]
[/sarcasm]
- A bass is only quality if it's got the right mark on the headstock
- It has to be the expensive version of a FSO (Fender-shaped object)
- Gotta be made in 'Murica
- Must be old enough to have had a mid-life crisis
- Tort
For everyone's consideration: Are there any bad basses anymore?
A "good" bass is one that gets you playing. A "quality" bass is one that other people respect for whatever reason - often based upon brand perception and reputation, sometimes based on marketing and endorsements. (It's a subjective matter these days, which is why "quality" means something different to everyone you'll ask. It's also why discussions like this gain traction on Talkbass.) These two concepts are orthogonal, and thus completely unrelated.
It become a trick of psychology. Something being "quality" implies that the rest isn't, and after a certain base level these value judgements are based on emotion and nebulous ideas. That's why if you ask a question like this, you won't get straight answers from the people who define it.
"Quality" is subjective. "Good" gets you playing. You are correct in saying that the player matters far more than the instrument itself.
A professor of philosophy drove himself nuts viewing the word “quality” as many view the word “vintage”.
He wrote a book about it which sold pretty well.
That seems like a completely rational answer.Threads like this puzzle me.
Exactly what are you hoping to get at, OP? Do you think people are going to come here and rationally, dispassionately debate something as subjective as "quality," knowing that a dozen other posters are going to pounce on them and point out why they're wrong?
A "quality" bass is a bass that a player can play well. And different players look for different things, so I doubt there's a rational answer.
Most of what makes a quality bass IS subjective. The sound you love I may hate. I may hate the way a bass feels, you may love it. Someone might think that a good finish is mandatory and I don't give much weight to the finish.Try hard to leave out unadulterated opinion and subjectivity.