I wanted to smoke a pack of cigarettes a day without coughing, so I smoked four per day for a decade. Now I have lung cancer.
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
However, if you cant play it clean and accurate at 100% FIRST, then you are wasting your time.
Hopefully you’re kidding about the lung cancer…I wanted to smoke a pack of cigarettes a day without coughing, so I smoked four per day for a decade. Now I have lung cancer.
However, if you cant play it clean and accurate at 100% FIRST, then you are wasting your time.
Hmmm i have to disagree a bit.
There is definitely something to shocking your system with a tempo that is too fast and then reducing it. The slower tempo feels much easier after a struggle at a faster tempo.
On balance I have to side with @IamGroot on this question. You have to know the thing 100% before first. The only thing to be gained from 'overclocking' before you know the music is to expose, by faltering, the bits you know the least. The benefit is that you quickly discover the place(s) to focus your efforts.
Of course once it is known then there are some 'comfort at tempo' benefits to be had.
There's degrees of cleanliness and accuracy, 100% doesn't mean anything. If you speed things up awhile, then slow down and find it helps, keep doing it.
Surely something is accurate or it isn't? There are degrees of cleanliness I guess, but accuracy...? I'd have to pull the pedants card on that one!
Really? You think you can play more accurately than a computer calibrated to hit the notes within 0.0001s? There's degrees of everything.
Something is either accurate or its not. If it's not accurate then it's "very close". There are degrees of closeness, but not accuracy IMO.
Let's agree to disagree, no good can come from this discussion.
I agree, I would never use that technique before knowing the song. However, once I know the song but can't get beyond, say, 90% tempo, I find the overclocking technique helps me make tempo gains. Once I get to tempo, I then push on another few % and I find that helps me lock in better at tempo.
Maybe not for everyone but I find it a useful tool personally.
Not necessarily. You might want to pause and take a good look at your technique. For example, plucking or fretting with a severely bent wrist will cause that kind of forearm pain, because the muscles (in your forearm) that control the tendons that move your fingers have to work much harder. You should have plenty of strength in those muscles already because you exercise them all day, every day -- every time you move your fingers.EDIT
It's actually about forearm muscle. Whenever I play close to my limits, my forearm starts to hurt (either on top side, from straightening fingers, or bottom side, from bending them).
Conclusion: muscle is not sufficiently developed.
Solution: muscle exercise.
Exactly. As they say, it isn't practice that makes perfect -- it's perfect practice that makes perfect. Every time you practice something at a faster tempo than you can play perfectly you are practicing errors.I find that playing stuff fast that I cant play perfect at normal tempo is counterproductive as I have to go unlearn/relearn
But did it stop you coughing??I wanted to smoke a pack of cigarettes a day without coughing, so I smoked four per day for a decade. Now I have lung cancer.