What I don't understand is... why an alder body\maple neck\rosewood fretboard on a lakland or some other boutique brand would result in a different tone than it would on a fender. If all the electronics and woods used are the same, the bass should in fact sound similar? I understand that no two pieces of woods are identical thus I said "similar" instead of "same".
I understand contruction may be a little more flawed on an SX than it would a ZON, meaning the neck might not fit perfectly in the pocket that is on the body. SO what I have concluded (correct me if I am wrong) is that tone comes from construction or.... Some companies know how to distinguish the perfect piece of alder, maple, etc...
This leads me to the big question. Is alder truly alder? Is maple truly maple? If so then they should all give similar results if they are constructed the same?
OR
THere are good pieces and bad pieces of a particular type of wood?
I understand contruction may be a little more flawed on an SX than it would a ZON, meaning the neck might not fit perfectly in the pocket that is on the body. SO what I have concluded (correct me if I am wrong) is that tone comes from construction or.... Some companies know how to distinguish the perfect piece of alder, maple, etc...
This leads me to the big question. Is alder truly alder? Is maple truly maple? If so then they should all give similar results if they are constructed the same?
OR
THere are good pieces and bad pieces of a particular type of wood?