• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Disruptions in Music over Time

Feel free to modify as needed....

  • Published Sheet Music Pre-1800
  • Growth of Big Bands
  • The Phonograph Late 1800’s
  • Radio Early 1900’s
  • Growth of Music Labels
  • Music Amplification ~1930
  • Fading of Big Bands>>>Growth of R&R/Soul
  • Television ~1950
  • Magnetic Tape Recording ~1950
  • Musical Synthesis ~1970’s
  • Proliferation of Cassette Late 1970’S
  • Video Music ~1980’s
  • Fading of Vinyl
  • Music Digitzation (CD) ~1980’s
  • The Internet WWW ~1990’s
  • File Sharing and Streaming ~2000’s
  • Fading of CD
  • Smart Phone and Tablets ~2000’s
  • Social Media ~2010’s
 
Last edited:
Maybe analog synthesis ~70s and digital synthesis ~80s. Dunno if "computer musical synthesis" was prevalent enough to be disruptive in the 70s. Might also want to give a shout-out to the proliferation of various music recording technologies, (analog tape/multi-track/digital) including sequencing in the 70s/80s.
You are right. I should have just put musical synthesis. I was thinking MOOG, but of course those are analog as you note.

Can you suggest some dates for proliferation of the various recording technologies?
 
Tape recording - 50s (invented 40s, but not widespread). Multi-track recording - 60s (invented 50s, but not widespread). Digital? Hm. Dunno if digital tape was all that disruptive. I'd say hard drive or solid-state was more so, so... 00s? Maybe even teens? Even hard drives seemed pretty expensive to me back in the aughts, never mind SSDs.
A tangent that is probably too confusing for most people to wrap their minds around is the influence of the microelectronics industry. The price per unit operation (memory and logic) has plummeted in a logarithmic fashion enabling all kinds of innovations in music technology. My laptop I am typing on ($2,000) has more memory and processing power than a 1980's Cryo-Cooled Cray supercomputer (>$1M).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MattZilla
Feel free to modify as needed....

  • Published Sheet Music Pre-1800
  • Fading of Classical >>>Growth of Big Bands
  • The Phonograph Late 1800’s
  • Radio Early 1900’s
  • Growth of Music Labels
  • Music Amplification ~1930
  • Fading of Big Bands>>>Growth of R&R/Soul
  • Television ~1950
  • Musical Synthesis ~1970’s
  • Proliferation of Cassette Late 1970’S
  • Video Music ~1980’s
  • Fading of Vinyl
  • Music Digitzation (CD) ~1980’s
  • The Internet WWW ~1990’s
  • File Sharing and Streaming ~2000’s
  • Fading of CD
  • Smart Phone and Tablets ~2000’s
  • Social Media ~2010’s
I wouldn’t say that the individual trajectories of classical and ‘big band’ have anything to do with each other, or are even sequential. There was jazz(as an African American derived dance music)in the form of Dixieland way before that, preceeded by Ragtime, with urban blues(the Bessie Smith variety, not the Charlie Patton country style, although influential)running a parallel path. Big bands were severely impacted by WW II, and there was the rise of the more cerebral ‘bop’ played by smaller ensembles, with ‘jump’ and the subsequently derived rock’n’roll taking up the slack in dance music. ‘Classical’ remained a sit-down/listen-to art music.

The first profound technological breakthrough of the 20th century was the move from acoustic recording to electronic in the 20’s, right after the establishment of radio in the earliest part of the decade, the first mass media beyond newspapers and movies(which didn’t have sound yet). With electronic recording, the use of microphones (and the tubes that powered them)changed how singers sang, and increased the fidelity. As this equipment became more portable, and the record companies realized that there was a market for a wide variety of localized folk musics, more of that got recorded and distributed, to home playback units and by radio...people in Chicago could be exposed to cajun music, people in New York could hear southern hillbilly or western cowboy, and so on, and stylistic cross-pollinations like Western Swing could occur. Hawaiian music became all the rage in the ‘20 for example, introducing the ukelele and steel guitar to the mainland and the world.

The other major game changer not on that list was the discovery of magnetic tape recording when the US invaded Germany at the end of WWII. Than in turn changed the concept of recording in real time, plus improving audio fidelity, and led to multi-track and stereo.
You should should pick up on this...
American Epic - Wikipedia
 
@Michedelic So would you put acoustic to electronic recording before the influence of radio in the timeline?

Also, could you explain to me the difference? I like your suggestions, BTW.

****EDIT NOTE**** I think I understand the acoustic vs electronic now. I inherited a bunch of 1890 - 1920 78's. They were recorded through a funnel into the hot wax. Amplification came next. Good point.
 
Last edited:
I like, but have they been disruptive to music? Have games changed music in a way that can be quantified? Just a question, not a criticism of your comment.:smug:
Maybe I'm not sure what we mean by disruptive here. Music in general or people pursuing playing music? It's certainly exposed many a people to music; on the other hand, I know many a folk who started on something like Guitar Hero, tried to learn an instrument and inevitably reverted back to the former do to lack of commitment.
 
Maybe I'm not sure what we mean by disruptive here. Music in general or people pursuing playing music? It's certainly exposed many a people to music; on the other hand, I know many a folk who started on something like Guitar Hero, tried to learn an instrument and inevitably reverted back to the former do to lack of commitment.
Most people would say disruptive technologies radically alter how things are done and have a major impact going forward. A comparison would be incremental advancement of known technologies (like one track tape, to two track, two 8 track, etc). So going from hot wax to tape would be disruptive. Going from tape to digital would be disruptive.

All of this is subjective to a certain extent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quinn Roberts
Most people would say disruptive technologies radically alter how things are done and have a major impact going forward. A comparison would be incremental advancement of known technologies (like one track tape, to two track, two 8 track, etc). So going from hot wax to tape would be disruptive. Going from tape to digital would be disruptive.

All of this is subjective to a certain extent.
Ahhh, I had the wrong disruptive in mind then! :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basslice
@Michedelic So would you put acoustic to electronic recording before the influence of radio in the timeline?

Also, could you explain to me the difference? I like your suggestions, BTW.
Commercial radio started up circa 1921/22, but not as initially far reaching as gramophones/phonographs, which were already established. All of this was happening in fits and starts depending on what part of the country you were in, as well as what you could afford. Music as content took a little while to get established. While there were various efforts to develop electronic recording around that time, or even before, it was only around 1924/25 that it was fully adopted, by the Victor(which became RCA)and Columbia(CBS)labels. The difference between the two methods is that acoustic recording gathers the sound of the musicians or vocalists by way of an acoustic horn, and sends those vibrations to a needle or lathe that cuts the groove directly to a wax disc(hence the slang term for a record); shellac copies were made off the wax disc, plated by metal, on the resultant mass produced records that were heard back through an acoustic horn on a player. The basic concept hasn’t changed; you now hear music that was recorded in some magnetically based manner, back through magnetically manipulated diaphrams, from PA speakers down to earbuds. Which brings us to electrical recording. A microphone and a speaker are essentially the same thing, it’s just the size of the diaphram and direction of audio information that is different. Once the microphone was developed, and the recent vacuum tube technology was employed to amplify the signal coming through it, that was used to capture the sound in the room and on to the cutting lathe, and eventially the playback acoustic horn gave way to amplification and speakers.
 
Digital Audio Workstations ~ 2000”s

These have completely changed how music is made, how it sounds, and how much music is produced.

This, yup. Aside from file sharing (and now streaming), this was the most obvious thing I noticed growing up in the 00's. Everyone could make music in their bedroom...

Also, I'm not sure if "Music Amplification" captures the whole thing, but electric instruments (guitars, basses) were soon not just about being loud(er), but they changed what could be done musically.

Finally, and I hate to say it, but COVID-19 totally screwed up live music in 2020. I suppose it's too early to say, but I wonder what long term effects we will see... we can only hope it will be just a lost year or two, but who knows...
 
I love history. It can put things in perspective. We all think the current here and now has been around forever. So untrue. We live in a blink of an eye.

Some pre-1800 musical innovations would probably include things like understanding room acoustics and instrument design.

Imagine a world lit by candle and the only music you would hear would be at church, a pub or festival or at home. That was pretty much it not too long ago.:bassist:
 
Digital Audio Workstations ~ 2000”s

These have completely changed how music is made, how it sounds, and how much music is produced.
Agreed. Trying to figure out where this goes in the timeline since I had been using home 4-tracks going back to the early 90's. Not completely clear if the transition from home 4-track tape to portable at home digital is disruptive, but it all belongs on the timeline. What do you think?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max Bogosity
Some pre-1800 musical innovations would probably include things like understanding room acoustics and instrument design.

For sure. It's been many years since I've traveled to Greece, but I distinctly remember the acoustics in their old amphitheaters. I don't know what other (contemporary) civilizations had, but good acoustics made it possible to have live events for larger crowds.

I'm also still amazed at the richness of acoustic instruments (pianos, guitars). You can almost literally hear sound waves bouncing around inside...

Also, those massive church organs. That's some impressive stuff for the so called "dark ages" :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Basslice