• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Do headstocks ever become a buying factor.....

Do headstocks ever become a buying factor?


  • Total voters
    156
  • Poll closed .
I have often found that the shape of a guitar(bass or 6-string guit-fiddle) headstock can be a deciding factor of a purchase. There have been several times that I have loved the body and playability of a guitar and just COULD NOT buy the thing because I hated the look of the headstock.

Feel free to call me shallow, but this is just how my brain is wired.:D
 
I try not to get hung over on how an instrument looks anymore but I will say that a headstock is a make it or break it as far as aesthetics go for me. No matter how good the rest of the bass may look, if the headstock looks goofy it's just a goofy looking bass. Call me weird, but I'm more judgmental about headstock's then bodies.
haha
 
Yeah, in a weird way i guess i'm a headstock snob... some just drive me insane. Given, my tastes almost always sway towards vintage/classic-styled gear anyway, but i really can't stand the headstocks on things like Warwicks, or on an Ibanez.

As much as I like Fender style headstocks, I think Gibson style look even better... the best of all, however... is the 70's Guild headstock. Awesomely cool. But of course it's all a matter of taste anyway, so YMMV, IMHO, yadda yadda.
 
Me no need no stinkin' headstock! :hiding:

headless1.jpg
 
I always kinda groan a bit when I see Fender-alike headstocks (on non-Fenders of course). I realize that's a huge percentage of the bass population, but still. It can't be that hard to come up with something even a little different!