Nanu nanu technology?
Saw opportunity knocking with that one..... glad someone took advantage!
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
Nanu nanu technology?
Attotechnology?
Wotcha mean? We ARE apes.

No one yet has explained how they moved blocks of stone that large up and into place, no theory yet builds them with the technology they possessed. Earth ramp? Nope, serpentine ramp? How to make the turns in a diminishing radius? Find the explanation that works with the tech they had...
Ramps and rollers and muscle are all they needed. Admittedly I'm not a construction engineer but I'm having a hard time seeing where the insurmountable problem is.
Believing has no place in science.
There was something on Discovery or History channel where they asked a guy from a rigging company about how he'd go about placing the blocks in the pyramids. He said some of them were too big, and would likely split due to their great mass if he were to try to lift them with a strap on a crane.
Muaguana said:
Jazz Ad said:The processes used to built the pyramids, cathedrals, Moai and any antique building are well known and easy to reproduce, given enough ressources and people.
It's a common misconception/urban legend that we have no idea how it was done.
The processes used to built the pyramids, cathedrals, Moai and any antique building are well known and easy to reproduce, given enough ressources and people.
It's a common misconception/urban legend that we have no idea how it was done.
uhm....there are stones in ancient egypt that can't be moved with today's super cranes. you got a couple million people and a couple miles of rope? cause it still would'nt move.
Still doesn't explain how they got them up there... Just a theory of their composition. No design using ramps & rollers gets 70 ton stones up there, let alone with such precision. But I understand the doubt... There is more than enough evidence, sightings from astronauts, pilots etc. for me to corroborate the physical evidence left on the earth, for others, maybe not...
'zactly!!!I think it's the epitome of human arrogance to believe that we are the only intelligent life anywhere. Just given the small amount of the universe that we know of, not to mention all of the other parts we, as of yet have no clue about.
Muaguana said:Let's take pause and examine the situation. It is apparent the ancient Egyptians constructed gargantuan monuments using very primitive tools. Exactly how this happened is a mystery. Some people prefer to wait on scientists to figure this out, others tend to jump to the conclusion that intelligent beings from another world flew here (implying they are capable of the incredible feat of interstellar travel) and helped the Egyptians build the pyramids for no apparent reason. Oh, and said beings are not quite mentioned in detail in hieroglyphic records.
Which reaction seems more reasonable?
Still doesn't explain how they got them up there... Just a theory of their composition...
If life possibly exists somewhere else in the universe, then it is also possible that life does not exist anywhere else than on Earth. There is nothing arrogant about privileging that last alternative.
However the same cannot be said about someone who is absolutely convinced that anybody leaning more on the side of alternative #2 is arrogant!