Fair enough.. my argument is that no instrument is obsolete based purely on the fact that adding strings for someone who is already use to it and the learning curve might not justify the advantages (hence the 6 string mention) I'll address each line to not be ambiguous.
So no 1 BEAD bass would not accomplish everything- off the top of my head an open D strong alternating with the octave and 7b on the next highest string (which you no longer have) Even Billy Sheehan who primarily is USE to a 4 banger needs a double neck with the BOTH BEAD and EADG tuning...Billy is a pretty great player... why would he still need the standard neck (besides the obvious spectacle) if he could have done everything on a 4.. going back to ppl confusing being use to something and breaking out of comfort.
I'll only address a few out of time constraints.
I mention the ADGC bass only because it was brought up as a solution early... it's ridiculous.
And AGAIN.. it's not that the 5er makes anything obsolete.. don't mince words. Does having a 5 eliminate getting a 4 because something isn't covered.. you bet. Getting a 5er and getting familiar on it definitely eliminates HAVING to get a four.. That logic doesn't work the other way around. (I don't want to bust out an example of a local 3 string bass player doing everything HE does on it and not needing the 4 string... we'll be here all day)
Again the reason I think people are getting defensive is not necessarily because of the 5er vs 4 thing.. I think it might be more being familiar with the 4 and someone being told they NEED a 5 and they HAVE to relearn... that's not the case. No one should tell anyone that. Play what you comfortable with learning.. I was just starting some of MY thoughts on the advantages and why the work around for trying to achieve the same desired results might not be practical.
It's these applying logic trains to opinions that don't move the conversation forward.
So no 1 BEAD bass would not accomplish everything- off the top of my head an open D strong alternating with the octave and 7b on the next highest string (which you no longer have) Even Billy Sheehan who primarily is USE to a 4 banger needs a double neck with the BOTH BEAD and EADG tuning...Billy is a pretty great player... why would he still need the standard neck (besides the obvious spectacle) if he could have done everything on a 4.. going back to ppl confusing being use to something and breaking out of comfort.
I'll only address a few out of time constraints.
I mention the ADGC bass only because it was brought up as a solution early... it's ridiculous.
And AGAIN.. it's not that the 5er makes anything obsolete.. don't mince words. Does having a 5 eliminate getting a 4 because something isn't covered.. you bet. Getting a 5er and getting familiar on it definitely eliminates HAVING to get a four.. That logic doesn't work the other way around. (I don't want to bust out an example of a local 3 string bass player doing everything HE does on it and not needing the 4 string... we'll be here all day)
Again the reason I think people are getting defensive is not necessarily because of the 5er vs 4 thing.. I think it might be more being familiar with the 4 and someone being told they NEED a 5 and they HAVE to relearn... that's not the case. No one should tell anyone that. Play what you comfortable with learning.. I was just starting some of MY thoughts on the advantages and why the work around for trying to achieve the same desired results might not be practical.
It's these applying logic trains to opinions that don't move the conversation forward.
One BEAD 4 string would accomplish everything you need. If you don't need the C string, why would you need to bring two basses? Your reason for playing a 5 are simply preference, not a "need". Again, there's nothing in your post that renders a 4 "obsolete". Which is the argument of a few and the reason for any defensiveness shown by people.

