I think this poll needs another option. "Wood affects the tone, but not critically"
Rosewood is warmer and maple is brighter, You guys all proved this here:
Can You Tell The Difference??? MAPLE vs. ROSEWOOD
This test is wrong right from the start.
He swapped the necks. This. And here we got some room for different results results:
- Nut Material - Believe it or not, nut can affect your tone while you fret instrument. When you change the nut - you change the resonant frequency of your bass. Even the two plastic nuts can have different resonant frequency. One can weight more and this will be enough. This is the reason when you attach something heavier/lower weight you can move deadspots - You are changing resonant frequency.
- Different frets - same as above - you are changing resonant frequency.
- Different keys - same as above - you are changing resonant frequency.
- Consistency of picking - It's hard to be consistent in 100%, harder strum - brighter attack.
- Actually person who did this test, right from the start tell people that there will be two different woods (maple and rosewood). So with brighter sounding sample people just contribute it to maple and so on.
When he will not told which fretboard wood he used - the test will be more reliable. Because, if the difference between maple and rosewood fingerboard is so noticeable, you can blindly tell them apart, right ?
Tests like this should be run in very controlled enviroment. This can exclude any variables which can contribute to result.
Here is funny test :
This guy literally REMOVED whole neck, with fingerboard. And guess what - zero difference. You can see there was frequency analyzer so it's not conjecture.