• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Reverse P Wiring Harness question

Hi.. I'm building a passive double reverse pbass type thing. I'm interested in what is ostensibly a JB control set up. 1 Vol, 1 Blend, 1 Master Tone. I assume that I can just purchase a JB wiring harness set. Any thoughts on Pot values or cap values. I was thinking 500K for a bit of extended treble range and maybe .22 mf cap.

Any advice as always is sincerely appreciated....

Also posted this in hardware, probably shouldn't have done that.
 
Yep, a Jazz harness would be fine. One twist you might consider series-parallel switches for both pickups, which would allow for a more Jazz-like tone. Push-pull volume pots would work for that.

You could also go with volume-tone-3 position switch, if you don't care about various pickup blends.

For your cap, you mean .022 uF. (The value only matters if you turn down the tone all the way or very close too it. Above about 2, the pot does all the work, and the cap is effectively out of the circuit.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiscoRiceJ
What are your goals? Also, what pickups are you planning to use?

overall, your plan is a good starting point, but I'd encourage some experimentation before settling on particular component values. It is very cheap and easy to do, can just use some parts (caps, resistors, pots) and alligator leads.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiscoRiceJ
What are your goals? Also, what pickups are you planning to use?

overall, your plan is a good starting point, but I'd encourage some experimentation before settling on particular component values. It is very cheap and easy to do, can just use some parts (caps, resistors, pots) and alligator leads.
Typically I bring in a little of the bridge pickup for growl and bite. I mostly leave the tone wide open. Sometimes if I'm working with other bands I bring the tone down depending on the material.

The blend works for my active bass. I assumed it would work the same for a passive bass but others have suggested that's not the case.
 
What are your goals? Also, what pickups are you planning to use?

overall, your plan is a good starting point, but I'd encourage some experimentation before settling on particular component values. It is very cheap and easy to do, can just use some parts (caps, resistors, pots) and alligator leads.
I have a Dimarzio model p for the neck pickup and a Hway 1 for the bridge.
 
Yeah, blend can be tricky with passive basses. Imo two volumes work better. What I'd probably try are two 500k linear taper volume pots. One disadvantage of 500k pots is that you have less granular control; linear taper might help counter that (some have confirmed this, but I never actually tried it for blending two pickups).

Another thing some people do is have a master volume, and then a volume for bridge pickup, which allows you to blend in the bridge pickup to taste (But you cant solo it), and you keep the master volume function.

for the tone control, you could try a 500k pot (audio taper!), but some feel like you lose too much control vs 250k pots. I didn't have that problem. Another option that combines the two is a 250k no-load pot, which gives you the function of the 250k pot but is out of the circuit when fully open and this gives you the brightness of a 500k pot (even brighter).

For your pickup choices, the traditional approach would be to put the hotter pickup (I think that would be DiMarzio) in the bridge position, as they will blend better. DiMarzio at the neck would overpower the other pickup. BUT, it may actually work well for what you want so try it. You could also add a series/parallel switch for the DiMarzio - it would lose some of the oomph in parallel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiscoRiceJ
I'd love to see this project when it's complete. I've been a fan of the double reverse P for years. My very first bass when I was 15 was an Ibanez double reverse P. And since then I've had two custom-made but they've both been sold so I don't currently have one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiscoRiceJ
Yeah, blend can be tricky with passive basses. Imo two volumes work better. What I'd probably try are two 500k linear taper volume pots. One disadvantage of 500k pots is that you have less granular control; linear taper might help counter that (some have confirmed this, but I never actually tried it for blending two pickups).

Another thing some people do is have a master volume, and then a volume for bridge pickup, which allows you to blend in the bridge pickup to taste (But you cant solo it), and you keep the master volume function.

for the tone control, you could try a 500k pot (audio taper!), but some feel like you lose too much control vs 250k pots. I didn't have that problem. Another option that combines the two is a 250k no-load pot, which gives you the function of the 250k pot but is out of the circuit when fully open and this gives you the brightness of a 500k pot (even brighter).

For your pickup choices, the traditional approach would be to put the hotter pickup (I think that would be DiMarzio) in the bridge position, as they will blend better. DiMarzio at the neck would overpower the other pickup. BUT, it may actually work well for what you want so try it. You could also add a series/parallel switch for the DiMarzio - it would lose some of the oomph in parallel.
This.
Blends can be tricky with passive basses, the ungrounded, no load blend knob thread here on TB is a great blend, though.
Easier yet is just doing VVT with 500K linear volumes with push/pull series/parallel for each pickup to get those faux J tones, 500K audio tone (or 250K no load) and maybe a slightly bigger cap-like .033-.047uF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiscoRiceJ