TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
In my world I know people who play in 4 bands. It's my area and context I suppose but I don't know anyone who could do that very well. I can sub for a band here and there, but I can sort of "get by" at best. It works, but not really. We have a guy in our band who plays in multiple bands and he's a drag on us. The rest of us pull him through every gig and he has to fake it a lot.
There are people who can do that well, they're way better than I am, not weekend warriors like I am.
I've been in bands that basically only had one gig. It's better than nothing I suppose, but I really enjoy the different places and crowds we run into. We have tons of songs to draw from, how would I do this with 4 bands? Maybe they all play the same songs?
But I agree, it's better than nothing if you're enjoying it.
Yeah. In my world, if you sub, you'd best put in the time woodshedding the whole setlist.
Advantages:
- Do it often enough, they'll be overlap in material between bands.
- Do it often enough, the learning process becomes easier/faster.
- Being completely prepared makes for better odds you'll be considered again, maybe even worked into regular rotation; The return on time investment will come quicker.
I've begun to shed entire set lists. What I realized is that a fair amount of my practice time can be devoted to shedding practically anything that gets my fingers moving and maintains my chops. I can turn anything into an exercise, and new material often uncovers technical problems that I wasn't aware of, even if it's basic stuff.Yeah. In my world, if you sub, you'd best put in the time woodshedding the whole setlist.
Advantages:
- Do it often enough, they'll be overlap in material between bands.
- Do it often enough, the learning process becomes easier/faster.
- Being completely prepared makes for better odds you'll be considered again, maybe even worked into regular rotation; The return on time investment will come quicker.
Oddly enough my main band has one venue. We stayed at our previous venue for more than a decade before it closed. It's hard to find a place that can host a 19 piece jazz band, figure out the logistics, etc. And we can't realistically play more gigs than once a month.
I'm with four bands right now. Seems each band has one place they book regularly... and not much else. Is that how it is now?
I'd much rather have one band that books several places. Four bands' worth of songs to learn is a bit much! I don't have enough study time for that.
As the booker of gigs for my band, I ask that we are the only band you are booking with as trying to book around everyone’s competing schedule is not practical for a band that books a lot of gigs. Granted, I have us booked a year out.
I'd opt for four bands each with one stage rather than obe band playing four times as much. One setlist gets boring fast. One-off gigs are ideal with a rotation of players and different set lists.
This is a great point. You can broaden your pallet if you actually take the time to sit down and learn new songs instead of just winging them.If you don't have time then you don't have time, but as mentioned by someone else, the more songs you learn, the easier it becomes to learn new songs.....