I've always had great luck with ebay.. I've always received what I expected to receive, and have actually been pleasantly surprised by an exceeded expectation numerous times. This time was different.. while the bass is far from a train wreck, the condition simply does not match the description. The seller said some very specific things, like "frets are like new".. they're not shot, but they're far from new. There's years of wear, but plenty of life left.. how hard is that to disclose/describe? Then there's the "few very minor dings, but they're barely noticeable, and none are through the finish" .. they're very noticeable, and many are through the finish. Next was "none of the usual 'buckle rash' that you normally see" .. well, maybe, but there are dents, nicks and scratches all over the back of this thing... no "buckle rash" though, so I guess that one's my fault. I actually think once this initial frustration wears off, I'll really dig the hell out of it, but still.. I bid higher than I would have on this thing because of the description, which made it sound like it was near mint. I don't mind paying a little extra for something that's in spectacular condition. The photos didn't reveal any of this, I guess due to angles, etc.. he did a great job of showing it in it's best light and didn't show any of the warts, nor did he mention they were there... while I should have asked about every square inch of it, by the time the frets are like new, there's no noticeable dings and no buckle rash, it's easy to fill in the blanks with goodness... the description was simply wrong. Had he disclosed any damage, I'd have thought to probe further..
So, the question is, would you just chalk all that up to "lesson learned" and eat the amount you feel you overpaid for what you thought was an extremely clean bass? Or, would you... ??? I wrote the seller a note to let him know what I think, but I'm curious if y'all have any thoughts or advice. I think this thing has plenty of mojo and will be a bass I come to love, but I wouldn't have bid nearly as high if the description fully disclosed the actual condition of the bass. I guess I feel a little duped and a little stupid...
any words of wisdom?
So, the question is, would you just chalk all that up to "lesson learned" and eat the amount you feel you overpaid for what you thought was an extremely clean bass? Or, would you... ??? I wrote the seller a note to let him know what I think, but I'm curious if y'all have any thoughts or advice. I think this thing has plenty of mojo and will be a bass I come to love, but I wouldn't have bid nearly as high if the description fully disclosed the actual condition of the bass. I guess I feel a little duped and a little stupid...
any words of wisdom?
In a perfect world, he'll give me a little cash back and I'll keep this thing... it's pretty friggin' sweet. Not "like-new frets and barely-noticeable dings" sweet, but super sweet nonetheless. Every issue with the bass is cosmetic, and not that bad... which is all the more reason to simply disclose everything, and provide an accurate description. If I'd have been led to expect "typical dings and scratches for a 30yo bass" and "frets show wear, but have plenty of life", I'd be fine... that's the bass I received.