EBS Reidmar: 750 vs 502

hi,

choosing a new head and a bit got confused on Reidmar's specifications, the vendor doesn't list 8ohm power ratings and the thing about 'peak power vs RMS' also confuses me. what do I want/need:

1. 150-200W in a 8ohm 112
2. 300-500W in a 4ohm 212/210 or pair of 112s

which of those heads will be best for me? will 502 cover those needs or I need the 750?

I know that more power never hurts, but the 502 appeals to me as it's capable of 2ohm loads, so I can run two 4ohm 212s if I'll want to.

appreciating any advice. thanks

 

or maybe nearly the same question in other words: is Reidmar 502 on par on volume with MarkBass heads labeled as '500W@4ohm' (like LMII or LMIII)?

 

thanks @gimmeagig, I appreciate the comparison between Reidmar, Little Marcus and Eden WT (actually all three were on my short list). I got a Reidmar 750 some time ago and I'm digging it. I'm using it with a single NeoLine 112 and admit it may be too much for my needs, but I got a good deal on it and don't regret it.

like you, I'm not using the contour switch. the only thing I don't like with the 750 is that the pre-EQ DI is pre-gain (on 502 it's post-gain). I might flip for a 502 some day, it's basically the same amp with a different power section, without the 'Drive' control and with a different buffer (2M Ohms instead of 1M on 750; not really sure how different it will sound considering my pedalboard is buffered).

 

okay, as I got a 502, updating this thread.

my big surprise was my 502 and my 750 sound a bit differently. the difference is not only in the power amp, as I definitely can hear it in DI as well. and I can hear it with my active basses as well. I can hear the difference with filter disengaged.

so, my 502 sounds... uhm, more like EBS. like some baked-in flavour I actually expect from EBS. it has pronounced lows and highs with filter disengaged and the tone is rounder and more modern overall, like a bit synthy as well. again, that's the tone I really expect from EBS, that's the way their amps and preamps usually sound like.

my 750 on the other hand sounds much more transparent. with filter disengaged it's more of a clean DI tone than the EBS color. I'd say that it has a bump in the mids, similar to DIs like JDI, and the basic tone is more mid-forward, maybe with slightly rolled off lows.

when EQ is engaged, they sound closer, but still 502 is more synthy/colored. to get similar results, I'm boosting lows on the 750, but cutting on the 502, but that might be just pots' taper (they could vary from pot to pot, so the center might not be at the detent).

which will I keep? IDK yet, comparing both to see which I like better. but I surely didn't expect that there could be an actual difference in sound.

 

okay, I've played more into a 502 and definitely can say that it sounds differently to a 750, most observable with 'filter off'. I'll mostly repeat myself, but 502 is more round, smooth, colored with perceivable loss of details in high end. the 750 with filter off sounds like a Phil Jones or a linear amp, i.e. lots of zingy details. when the filter is on, those differences are not that prominent.

so why does it happen? I attribute this to a different buffer, IME a buffer could have exact same coloration, so that explains it. does this coloration really eat up dynamics? I'd say that not really, the 502 is still a responsive and dynamic amp.

then I got another surprise. I was under impression, Reidmars have a HPF, as the HD heads had. looking at specs, it doesn't seem so, for both. but the 750 has rolled off lows (just in the same ballpark as some of my passive DIs), that's why it's perceived as having a HPF. this said, my low B sounded best into 750; I think, I want a HPF for playing in the 502.

I also think that maybe the 502 has somewhat less floor noise, and that's a different power amp that makes it. not that the 750 is that noisy, but the 502 seem quieter to me.

which do I prefer at the end? I'd say the DI on the 502 sounds better (but the 750 isn't bad at all), but with a cab... IDK yet. 750 is more honest and open sounding and actually I have less problems with plugging whatever into it, it just sounds good, 502 is more picky. on the other hand, this coloration might help to sit better in mix (it kinda removes the frequencies that are usually taken by guitar).

so, bottom line: both 502 and 750 are great heads, but they do sound slightly differently, at least, mine do. if you don't mind some coloration to your signal (somewhat similar to TC or MarkBass heads), you'll find the 502 good. if you lean to the Phil Jones side, 750 might be a better choice.

as for power -- for me the 502 is pretty loud for a 125W RMS @ 8 ohms, but I've only played only on practice yet. with a single NeoLine 112 (8ohm) and volume below 9 o'clock it's loud enough to play with a drum set, or at least this was my experience. bear in mind that technically the 502 is still only a 250W RMS amp and it's very loud for that, on par with some heads labeled 500-something. but if you need more, get a 750/752 and don't overthink it. I probably just don't and that's it.

 

after playing three days in a 502, I'm selling it and keeping the 750. I prefer how it sounds into the cab and that's it. it's a pity, I tried to like this little fellow.

I know, this post is long, but now this story ends.

 

howdy! around 5cm in width and 3 cm in depth.

but the difference in weight is more significant (albeit that's less than a kilo), the 750 is harder to move around, while the 502 feels lighter.

 

well, my story isn't over. I've played a 502 with a band again and I like it more than the 750 at low volumes.

the 750 sounds like a big hifi amplifier and that's gorgeous. however, when playing a 502 with my band:
1. I'm able to turn it to lower volume to be heard
2. I hear more nuances in my playing

I still badly want a HPF to use with the 502 though.