• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

EMG 35HZ without preamp?

Dec 13, 2016
3,900
4,829
56
Cleveland, Ohio
I have a Spector currently with stock pickups and tonepump jr. (V-V-BASS BOOST-TREBLE BOOST)

What I would like to do is have a passive bass. (V-T-V-T)

From what I am seeing in the schematics on their website, I should be able to do this with two sets of 35HZ.

However, when I spoke with one of their reps, he was saying that I would need a BTS SYSTEM HZ. This seems to counter my goal.

Am I not understanding something? Will I achieve the goal with just two sets of 35HZ.
 
found this (and the search is your friend):
rbx375subdude67v-t-v-t-iso-png.3605577
 
Yep. If you want a bass that doesn’t use batteries, then the BTS is off the table.

And yes, two 35HZ will get you there. I believe they come with the tone pots and the wiring already, which should make things easier and cheaper for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: matante and BOOG
I played a pair of the 40 Hz for awhile about a decade ago without pre - same pickup, just in the 40 size instead of the 35 size. It was a little middy and lacked definition. It does alright with an EMG EXB, but I ended up just swapping them out for EMG full actives.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOOG
I played a pair of the 40 Hz for awhile about a decade ago without pre - same pickup, just in the 40 size instead of the 35 size. It was a little middy and lacked definition. It does alright with an EMG EXB, but I ended up just swapping them out for EMG full actives.
Thanks. Yes, I have three bass’s that are active but, I don’t want the Spector to be. The Warwick and ESP-LTD can do the job in that department. Generally, I prefer a passive bass and this swap will enable another but, out of the FSO category.
 
Yeah, I did search. Didn’t find what I was looking for. Was that really necessary to type?
Well you searched "their" website and spoke with a rep.
You didn't indicate a general search, so yeah, kind of necessary.
It wasn't an attack, but a suggestion. And he found something you didn't.
If you didn't like what he said, why stoop to the same level?
Maybe next time time "thanks for the info" and move on?
 
Thanks. Yes, I have three bass’s that are active but, I don’t want the Spector to be. The Warwick and ESP-LTD can do the job in that department. Generally, I prefer a passive bass and this swap will enable another but, out of the FSO category.
Have you thought about Bartolini CBC pickups? They have a wider range than the HZ's and aren't as mid pushed, and have good low end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mikewalker
By adding a loading capacitor, you can have any sound in between the two - somewhere in there, the porridge won't be too hot or too cold, it'll be just right.
Nah, I just get a different pickup, although the Washburn VCC control isn't too bad to thin out a guitar humbucker when you need a little lighter tone, especially in the neck position, but don't want to install something like a Bill Lawrence - Wilde Q-Filter. It will work on any standard 2-coil 4-lead passive humbucker pickup.
EmbeddedImage.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BOOG
Nah, I just get a different pickup.

I haven’t met a pickup that I couldn’t make sound better (to my tastes) by loading it capacitively. The nice thing about capacitor experiments are that they’re predictable (you know which direction the sound is going to go), and they’re 40 cents a shot. A pickup swap is a hundred dollar shot in the dark.
 
I did this and the overall output seemed to suffer. The sound was ok......It was more me than anything.....I wanted to make my 5 string spector to sound more like my 1/4 pound loaded jazz bass.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOOG
Nah, I just get a different pickup, although the Washburn VCC control isn't too bad to thin out a guitar humbucker when you need a little lighter tone, especially in the neck position, but don't want to install something like a Bill Lawrence - Wilde Q-Filter. It will work on any standard 2-coil 4-lead passive humbucker pickup.
View attachment 4847374
I haven’t seen a map like that since I was in the Marine Corps being told by our host nation guides, “only 500 meters”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tommy V
Use diagram 6 or 10 (w/o switch) EMG 40HZ wiring instructions on EMG website.
Yes, diagram 10 is what I had in mind. Thank you for the confirmation.


I did this and the overall output seemed to suffer. The sound was ok......It was more me than anything.....I wanted to make my 5 string spector to sound more like my 1/4 pound loaded jazz bass.
Was the output acceptable or did it become anemic? My ignorant assumption is that since they are passive, they should operate without a preamp with similar results to other (JV52 or GEEZER P and PJ sets) passive pickups that I use.
 

Latest posts