• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Empress ParaEQ MKII released!

I am still working on learning the Deluxe. Sheesh.. it does everything one would want from an analog EQ pedal. And conversely, it's actually simple to use! It's the EQ equivalent of a extremely well-rounded kitchen pantry, that isn't overly jammed up with esoteric items. Cooking with flavor, in the best, most competent ways that one can use on any given night. I love to cook, so that is an easy analogy to make.

The Deluxe is an excellent investment that will give an electric musician many ways to grow and color their sonic palette. I'm so glad I got one last year.
 
Last edited:
IMG_2511.jpeg

I’ve got the gizmotronics lab set up and doing some
comparisons.

Initial tests with my electric basses yesterday, today I’ll run the piezo on my upright.

So far, the para EQ sounds better than all the others in terms of
Clarity. However, there’s some
Character the other pedals bring (that I’m used to) so it’ll take a quite few gigs to sort them all out lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael Jewels
Jason, I see you also have the Boss GE-B7, which is what I compared my Empress Para EQ with.

I bought the Boss about 6 months before I bought the Empress, and it was a step up from just using my amp’s EQ.

Once I bought the Empress, I realized how much better it was.

When I say, better, this is naturally my opinion, but after using the Empress for about 4 years now, the other day, I decided to plug the Boss in again.

I couldn’t believe the difference!

After not hearing the Boss for a few years, it suddenly sounded very harsh to me.

It cannot hold a candle to the Empress!

The Empress is very smooth and transparent when compared with the Boss.

The Boss just has a harshness to it that is missing in the Empress.

I don’t play upright, but I have a Breedlove acoustic/electric Pursuit bass, which has a very warm, woody tone.

As warm as the Breedlove’s tone is, the Empress smooths it out and makes it even warmer.

It’s almost as though the Empress was made specifically for acoustic instruments, but it has this effect on all my basses.

Where the Empress is smooth and subtle, the Boss is harsh.

The Boss would be a good choice for Rock or Heavy Metal, whereas the Empress brings out the best in any instrument.

The Empress also splits hairs as far as EQing goes.

It was an interesting comparison, but it did surprise me.

I almost can’t imagine the newer versions sounding any better.

Much good luck with your new Empress.

Mike :thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
Interesting… what kind of music do you play?
I have a SolidGoldFX BetaV pedal with its special LPF switch, which I think is designed to sound like the 1960s B15 Ampeg, vintage warm. I also have a Broughton HPF LPF, and yes to get a similar sound I push the LPF way down into the mids, even 500Hz. It’s like closing off the tone knob on a typical Fender, but more articulate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smeet
Predominantly the Sadowsky, I presume? Those sound fantastic, but the fantastic sound is definitely a baked-in voicing

Sorry I missed this reply. I really like the Sadowsky on my passive fender with flats. However I’ve got the pedal in the shop awaiting a cleaned up or replacement volume pot. Mine was really scratchy / borderline shorting out and it was just out of warranty unfortunately.
 
Thanks @Michael Vee for calming me down (at least for now.. :) )
In my case it would be exchange. I would maybe even sell the Broughton Flip Top as well. Nothing wrong with it, just don't think I need it. So it would be without loss - just two pedals for one. It seems that distributor for Empress in my country stopped with distribution of this brand, so I can't make a side by side comparision for myself.
For the RFE, i believe the resonance is only on the cutoff frequency - similiar to how filter on a synth works. But still would be interesting to know what topology of filter that is.
I am not really in how nice pedals are visually, but must say that the Bass Comp in sparkle blue looks really cool in flesh.
To react on other piece of your info/topic of consideration - I have only one bass and want it to stay this way, though I'll maybe exchange it for something else later this year. But the venues I play in with my band on the other hand are really diverse, sometimes even in a bad way - so some kind of tool like this is needed.

I bet you can get a credible Fliptop tone with the ParaEQ Deluxe. The CabSim dial looks like some sort of HPF LPF.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cube Bass
Jason, I see you also have the Boss GE-B7, which is what I compared my Empress Para EQ with.

I bought the Boss about 6 months before I bought the Empress, and it was a step up from just using my amp’s EQ.

Once I bought the Empress, I realized how much better it was.

When I say, better, this is naturally my opinion, but after using the Empress for about 4 years now, the other day, I decided to plug the Boss in again.

I couldn’t believe the difference!

After not hearing the Boss for a few years, it suddenly sounded very harsh to me.

It cannot hold a candle to the Empress!

The Empress is very smooth and transparent when compared with the Boss.

The Boss just has a harshness to it that is missing in the Empress.

I don’t play upright, but I have a Breedlove acoustic/electric Pursuit bass, which has a very warm, woody tone.

As warm as the Breedlove’s tone is, the Empress smooths it out and makes it even warmer.

It’s almost as though the Empress was made specifically for acoustic instruments, but it has this effect on all my basses.

Where the Empress is smooth and subtle, the Boss is harsh.

The Boss would be a good choice for Rock or Heavy Metal, whereas the Empress brings out the best in any instrument.

The Empress also splits hairs as far as EQing goes.

It was an interesting comparison, but it did surprise me.

I almost can’t imagine the newer versions sounding any better.

Much good luck with your new Empress.

Mike :thumbsup:

Sorry I missed this reply. I agree with everything you’ve said.

I’ve actually got the boss EQ and fresh battery in the gig bag. I like using it on dusty outdoor gigs when I feel like I need a little preamp or feedback insurance.

I do still love my empress EQ as well. I like it on my upright especially.
 
I bet you can get a credible Fliptop tone with the ParaEQ Deluxe. The CabSim dial looks like some sort of HPF LPF.

I am about to find out. ParaEQ Deluxe arrived finally few days ago. Have a long week at work, so didn't have much time. But so far it looks it will not replace both Broughtons. I have the EQ on the start of the signal chain, after it is phaser, distortion and compressor. The Fliptop is last. Well, that all is in FX loop of Caveman preamp, so the Caveman is last. From the brief time I tested it so far I liked the sound when both ParaEQ and Fliptop were engaged. Looking forward to hear it on sunday rehearsal in band context.
 
  • Like
Reactions: butterfingers1
Has anyone of you tried to use the ParaEQ in an Effects-Loop of an Amp?
I'm currently looking for a new amplifier, but unfortunately there are very few with an EQ that is, in my opinion, even halfway usable. That's why I would like to use the ParaEq in addition to the built-in EQ. Specific candidates for amplifiers at the moment are one of the current GK Legacy or Fusion series as well as the Markbass Little Mark Vintage.
Just to make it clear why the ParaEQ should be in the effects path:
The amplifiers I'm looking for all have either a tube or some other "dirty" function in the preamp. I want to leave this sound "unchanged" in the first place, since the ParaEQ in front of the preamp would change the response of the circuit, but can apply changes if necessary. Mostly Room correction and such.
 
My short story for deluxe version.so sterile, so uninspiring.i return this after 5 min playing.q strip is much better
I own both. Both of them soung equally „sterile“ or „uninspiring“ to my ears but both are doing a great job as tone shaper, HPF/LPF, ….
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1442.jpeg
    IMG_1442.jpeg
    1.4 MB · Views: 21
Sakim, can you elaborate please?

I'd be interested in hearing a comparison.

Mike
Hi mike
I dont have sound sample for comparison.i never thought that eq can sound that clinical.it ruin tube sound, pf 50t with empress sound like d class amp.on the other hand q strip have some moyo.i definitely hear some coloration.so its me, i like caracter stuff, nothing wrong with empress
 
Has anyone of you tried to use the ParaEQ in an Effects-Loop of an Amp?
I'm currently looking for a new amplifier, but unfortunately there are very few with an EQ that is, in my opinion, even halfway usable. That's why I would like to use the ParaEq in addition to the built-in EQ. Specific candidates for amplifiers at the moment are one of the current GK Legacy or Fusion series as well as the Markbass Little Mark Vintage.
Just to make it clear why the ParaEQ should be in the effects path:
The amplifiers I'm looking for all have either a tube or some other "dirty" function in the preamp. I want to leave this sound "unchanged" in the first place, since the ParaEQ in front of the preamp would change the response of the circuit, but can apply changes if necessary. Mostly Room correction and such.
Most effects loops are line level, so you just need to make sure the Empress can handle that. The website says it runs at 27v internally, so odds are good it can. The other thing to be aware of is most Markbass heads use a parallel effects loop, so you'd have an unaffected signal blended with your EQed signal. You'd want to check the head you're looking at to be sure.