I'm no expert, but I give you my thoughts. I visualize it this way: the tension of the strings wants to rotate the neck towards the front of the bass, with the fulcrum being where the neck meets the top plate (table). This causes the back plate to be under tension, while the top plate is under compression in the longitudinal direction; also the top is under compression from the bridge in the front-to-back direction. The bass bar and the soundpost help with this compression stress. The back plate under tension makes the "button" (the part of the back plate that overlaps the end of the neck heel) very important for structural strength.
I would say that the neck joint itself is under compression near the fulcrum point (next to the top plate) while it is under tension towards the button. From what I've gathered of a few years reading opinions on this forum, the dovetail joint of old American basess is typically troublesome because of the low quality fitting they did at the factories then, and the very soft poplar wood they used for the counterpart neck block. It seems as if a dovetail is not really needed in the joint, and a well-fitted mortise and tenon joint is well adequate for the stresses.
Good luck with your project!! You've done a great job documenting the state of your bass!!
I would say that the neck joint itself is under compression near the fulcrum point (next to the top plate) while it is under tension towards the button. From what I've gathered of a few years reading opinions on this forum, the dovetail joint of old American basess is typically troublesome because of the low quality fitting they did at the factories then, and the very soft poplar wood they used for the counterpart neck block. It seems as if a dovetail is not really needed in the joint, and a well-fitted mortise and tenon joint is well adequate for the stresses.
Good luck with your project!! You've done a great job documenting the state of your bass!!