• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Ernie Ball Bass Noodle: Gig Report

I have seen these little things mentioned here and there on TB, but I thought I'd share a report after trying it out on a gig.

As jazz band directors, we sometimes get together to have reading sessions where we sit around and read through new (and sometimes old) charts to see if they are right for our groups. A lot of times, we do this at our state band conventions. A friend of mine put a reading session together and I was asked to play bass. We sight read about 15 charts in about 90 minutes. (I still call this a gig, since there are typically 40-50 other directors sitting in the audience. I have had much smaller audiences on some of my "real" gigs.) Anyway, I knew that most of these charts were going to be standard swing tunes, so I decided to throw on one of these:

IMG_0227.jpeg


For those who have not tried it, it is made out of similar material to a rubber bracelet. You just sort of weave it through your strings.

IMG_0226.jpeg


For the record, I use LaBella Low Tension Flats. With the noddle on it sounds similar to having a chunk of foam shoved in between the strings and the body, but it is a little different. Sustain was a bit better than foam. The articulation sounded about the same, but did not have the "plink" sound that you get with a stiff piece of foam. I had the muting qualities without the articulation change. One unique aspect is that it is much thinner on the G string side than the E string side. I think I had decent dynamic balance between all four strings. This is probably the biggest positive I see with the noodle vs. foam.

Did it sound like an upright bass? No. Did it sound like my normal electric bass? Not really. Was it an improvement? For the swing charts we were playing, I would say yes. Do I prefer this to foam? The jury is still out, but I will certainly try it again.

I left it on the whole set. Not a single person noticed (or cared). Although I did get a couple of "kudos" after the gig about my sight reading, no one said a word about my tone. I asked a buddy of mine what he thought about my tone and he just shrugged. I was humbly reminded that absolutely no one gives a rip about a bassist's tone unless they are covering something else up. No one obsesses over tone like we do.

Has anyone else tried this? Did you love it, hate it, or was it just "meh"?
 
I got a fair amount of use out of mine during my uni's musical theatre societies production of Addams Family. Being a uni student, I don't have an upright, nor the money, space or skill to play one. Sticking this on and rolling back the tone, then playing up close to the neck got me close enough that the MD was happy with it. Given the space we had in the 'pit' (They stuck us inside the house that was the set) I wouldn't have had room for an actual upright regardless.
 
I have played many musicals over the years ans been in many tight places. Playing inside a house on stage is a new one for me.

My go to materials for mutes are typically cheap dollar store sponges, or pick and pull foam I have lying around. This noodle changes the sound less drastically than the sponge, but slightly more than the light foam.

Glad to hear that it worked for you.
 
But they have to tool up and run the machines. Bow many do they have to make for the cost to come down to 15 cents? 1,000? 10,000? Will they ever sell that many?
It's part of a whole line of mutes and dampeners they're doing that are all made of the same material. Right now, there's the guitar mute noodle, bass mute noodle, and string dampeners for tailpieces, tremolo springs and headstocks. It wouldn't surprise me if they're being injection moulded on the same machine, maybe even using the same tool. Given the sudden interest in rubber bridge guitars, which the mute noodle for guitar is intended to simulate, I don't doubt they've already moved enough of them to recoup their costs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gopherbassist
I have it and I love it.
Also, I can suggest a little bit different way of install it on the bess - instead of hang it over the E string from to top side, and going under the G string, try it reversed - Hang it under E string, and then over the G string. It press a G string little bit harder and I love the sound a bit more that way.
However, I made a little video when I bought it (before I started mounting it the new way)

 
Can you move it farther away from the bridge to dampen more? I'd think you could squelch the tone right down if it was maybe 2 inches away from the bridge?
I can't find any foam that doesn't destroy itself. I roll up a Rag but it gets gradually more compressed. I'm sort of scared to use certain things that would damage my strings. (Cobalt flats) like butyl rubber hose.
 
I did try it from about an inch from the bridge, slowly moving it towards the bridge. For my sound, I like it right up against the bridge saddles. When it was an inch away, I heard more attack than tone. There is a sweet spot just a little away from the bridge that could be a good fit for the upright sound (playing on top if the fingerboard and mixing your eq just right). I like it when I sound close to an upright in articulation, but a more pure, amplified tone.

I did try the reverse install that Obra suggested. Definitely a different sound profile. It suppresses the G string a little more. I will be trying it the next time I gig with it.
 
I use foam but cut it at a slant so it follows the angle of the strings and dampens them all equally.
With regular gauge strings, the intonation offset is minimal and easily adjusted for.

So this goofy-looking noodle is not useful to me but good that it exists for those who need it.