• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fanned Fret Basses...why so few?

Bassheart365

Gold Supporting Member
Oct 19, 2014
2,866
5,928
Northern California
I've been playing fanned fret basses (Dingwall) for over 10 years now.

I predicted back then that these would really catch on - especially with the increasing popularity of 5 string basses where a longer B string really helps - and that more companies and independent lutheirs would start making FF models. I was wrong. Although Ibanez came out with kind of a "watered down" fanned fret (not much difference in scale lengths compared to the Dingwall) - that seems to be about it. Not sure why.

BTW - here are my two beauties. How could you not like these?

dingwall porn.jpg
 
Last edited:
Why would they catch on massively? They solve an issue that most bassists do not have while creating issues elsewhere, playing harmonics and chords is more difficult in addition to playing at a different spot than most are used to.

They serve an niche and do it well, I do not see them going anywhere (or really blowing up.) It doesn't help that major manufacturers, like Ibanez, put out watered down versions that do not even offer the benefits of a full fan.
 
Agreed. Plus they would require most bassists to re-learn the instrument from scratch. If I can't play live without staring at the neck to make sure I'm fretting in the right spot, then I'm not playing live very often.

Not really. I've played Dingwalls many times (but never owned one). The transition is actually very easy. In fact, not looking at the neck helps.
 
The added scale length allows you to have a clear B all the way up the fretboard, you do not get overtones like you do with shorter scale basses (sub-37")

But now you also have guys like Fred Bolton at Bee Basses that make 33" scale basses with amazing B strings that have excellent clarity and definition up the entire fretboard, while retaining the traditional look.
 
Not really. I've played Dingwalls many times (but never owned one). The transition is actually very easy. In fact, not looking at the neck helps.

Not for me mate, I rented one for a week from my local store because I wanted to know for sure. After a solid week of playing only an Ibanez 5-string with fanned frets, I was still struggling against muscle memory. The fanning wasn't even as dramatic as a Dingwall.
 
Agreed. Plus they would require most bassists to re-learn the instrument from scratch. If I can't play live without staring at the neck to make sure I'm fretting in the right spot, then I'm not playing live very often.

I think this misconception is the reason. The "crocked" frets look intimidating, and bass players assume they will need to re-learn their technique. I had the same misconception, but it only took me about 10 minutes to adjust.
 
It seems they're meant to fix a problem that most bass players aren't complaining about.

I have several 6 string basses and a 7 string. I can't say that I feel that the string response is poor due to lack of fanned frets. I can see how they might be useful if tuning below B or above a C string.

Believe it or not, acoustic players have been adopting fanned frets. It ends up being great for open tunings. Fanning ends up being somewhat necessary on 7 string flat top and archtop acoustics since a .070 is about the equivalent of a crappy 5 string when used at standard 25.5" scale length.