• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

"Fanned" fretless?

I found fanned fretted very easy to adapt to - literally 30 seconds.

I have not played fanned fretless, but as position of your fretting hand is critical to the intonation and, say on a four string, you will have four reference points to get used to for the intonation of each string, this is going to take a bit of learning. In saying that nothing is impossible and check out this beauty!

[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
 
Me too: definite case of relearning your technique and forgetting what you have learned. I suspect though that if your new to fretless then the learning curve would not be so steep.
 
There's really
no relearning on fanned frets.

There's a slight adjustment when chording up high. Some chords are actually easier, but how much chording can you do if you're working.
 
Another point/clarification. Although a longer B IS one major benefit of longer scale fanned fingerboards, the other benefits can be had with shorter scale lengths. The most significant of these is more even tension across all strings. I play both 32-35 and 34-37 scale fanned basses, preferring the shorter scale for chordal stuff or when I use the B rarely. I occasionally play a fretless that's "regular". IME switching to the fan is a breeze :-)
 
1" fan if I remember (34-35); Dingwall goes up to 3" (32-35), I think.

Dingwalls go 34" to 37" in their 5str.

Having played many basses (40+ I own right now) with different scales, ranging from 34" to 36" (conventional) and the Dingwalls, IMHO the fanned fret concept provides the most benefits if the B is 36(+)''. The other benefit is the even-ness of string tension and tone across the strings and across the board. I have no problem to go from "conventional" to fanned to "conventional fretless. At the end of September, I will have a fretless Dingwall to comment on the specific comparison ("conventional" to fanned fretless):bassist:
 
I 'thunk' wrong re the Dingwall - thanks for the correction.


I'll be keen to get the feedback on the 'fanned fretless'!

I agree no problems to go parallel fretted to fanned fretted to parallel fretless.
 
they are the 4str version of the traditional J-vibe. The G is sweeter than the Jazz and the E is tighter (equal tension and tone balance across the string and board). I am sure you can find the Super J review and see what some other players say
 
You know what I'd like to see? An unlined fanned fretless... :D

I was hoping that my Conklin fanned fretless was unlined but when I recieved it,it was then that I saw that it was not.

I can only speak from my experience playing a fanned fretless.

The lines would be an incredible help(and I really hate lines)it really does give you an indication where you are at on a multi scaled instrument.With out the lines it really is an all out open vast land on the fingerboard because with the fanned finger board naturally it becomes multi scaled so technically you would be playing at least two different scale fretless basses at one time(depending on how many strings your bass may have) :)
 
Jauqo is an incredible player both in terms of technique (from ERB to fretted and fretless) as well as groove. He really nailed it.

One of my fretless basses was unlined and even though the tone was huge and fat, I had a harder time to enjoy jamming with it. I needed to concentrate harder to play in tune compared with my other lined fretless