Just curious. It seems that people prefer the 4+1 config over the inline 5 on the headstock. Is this just an aesthetic thing, or are there advantages of one or the other?
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
rojo412 said:If I'm not mistaken, it was an effort to reduce the weight of the headstock at the very and and alleviate some "neck dive" issues.
Plus, it looks like all of the other companies' designs (Musicman, Sadowsky, etc) and Fender didn't want to be "innovative" or "original".
(And to anyone who doesn't get that, it's a JOKE because other companies copy Fender. HA HA HA)
If I'm not mistaken, it was an effort to reduce the weight of the headstock at the very and and alleviate some "neck dive" issues.
Plus, it looks like all of the other companies' designs (Musicman, Sadowsky, etc) and Fender didn't want to be "innovative" or "original".
(And to anyone who doesn't get that, it's a JOKE because other companies copy Fender. HA HA HA)
I personally feel there's fewer deadspots on the neck of the 4+1 headstock models.
sorry to be this guy but Musicmans were actually designed by Leo Fender.
bassguitarthund said:So does Fender still make both styles or was one just used for a short time. Not sure if I have ever saw the 4+1 on a Fender