Here are the white pearl blocks on my '78 maple j bass:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
and on my rosewood '72 j:
[Invalid or Expired Link Removed]
TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
Join free Log in
Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.
I have the 74 American Vintage. For slapping or fingering, it's an awesome bass !
I own both (AVRI 74 and 75) ... They're both great basses. Great tone out of each. The 74 has the chunkier neck ... I don't think you could go wrong with either
A CS '70 vs an NAV '74 or an AVRI '75? If money isn't a problem, there is nothing to question.![]()
Congratulations!Got a NOS 1970 CS. Waited for the logistics and I have it now......thanks all for all the info and assistance.
Id go with the 75 because of the nitro finish!
Well mine was finished in nitrocellulose but I think mine was a late production "one off" since the usual description of the 75 AV says they were finished in polyurethane (like the current 74 AV reissue). The 75 was discontinued in 2012 and mine has a 2012 serial number but it showed up for the first at Sweetwater last year, two years after being discontinued. My Sweetwater sales rep had no idea why it showed up so late, we speculated it was just late production from left over parts perhaps but there was no explanation from Fender. Moreover, the description on Sweetwater's website said it was finished in nitrocellulose which I thought might perhaps be a typo, but when it arrived it had the usual warning tag about how to care for nitro finishes and the pungent smell of fresh nitro when I opened the case confirmed the description was indeed correct.
So assuming mine was just a late production one off I wouldn't expect other 75 AVs to have nitro finishes. When I initially posted about this in my NBD post I don't recall anyone else saying their 75 AV was anything but poly finish.
'75. This was a big transitional year for the Jazz Bass (3-screw tilt neck, bridge pickup closer to the bridge, bullet truss rod, etc.).
To my knowledge, nothing worth mentioning happened to the Jazz Bass in 1974. Why was it even picked to replace the '75 model?
Actually, a bass-side thumbrest would be period-correct for a 1974 Fender Jazz Bass.There's an issue of the components at hand to recreate the bass, IMO. The '75 has the same hardware as the original, while the '74 uses the tuners from the '75. And they use a bass-side thumbrest drilling in the '74 pickguard.
I doubt that - the black block inlays were gone by 1975; nevertheless, the AVRI '75 features them instead of the white-pearl ones on the maple-board model. Moreover, the NAV '74 features a correct nitro-lacquered front headstock, while the '75 didn't. So, all in all, I find the '74 to be more period-accurate than the '75.It's 100% true that the '75 is truer to its original specs. But for a lot of players, the main difference between a '60s Jazz and a '70s Jazz is the sonic difference* in bridge pickup placement, not the aesthetic ones in 3-bolt v. 4-bolt or bullet truss v. heel truss. For those players, 1970 was the year the biggest change was made. That in and of itself IMO deserves a reissue covering the 70s tone/late 60s aesthetics of an early 70s Jazz bass. Fender could have filled this niche accurately with no problems, but I guess they didn't see enough profit in recreating their first-gen CBS clover tuners (the stamped ones used from 1967-74). Gotoh makes a replica, but they aren't stamped "Fender". Without those tuners, they really can't recreate anything made bewteen 1966 and 1974.