• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Fanned Fret?

Right? Gate keeping and pearl clutching is still a big thing I guess.

Because people have - sometimes very strong - opinions about issues that don't affect them directly and personally but do affect them ideologically. Why are so many people (males too) pro or contra abortion? They are surely not affected personally and directly but, they believe, ideologically and obviously indirectly. And this is enough for them to have a strong opinion on the matter at hand. Ideology is a very strong motivator for some people.
 
Because people have - sometimes very strong - opinions about issues that don't affect them directly and personally but do affect them ideologically. Why are so many people (males too) pro or contra abortion? They are surely not affected personally and directly but, they believe, ideologically and obviously indirectly. And this is enough for them to have a strong opinion on the matter at hand. Ideology is a very strong motivator for some people.
Fair enough. I was looking at it from a more rational viewpoint.
 
Last edited:
Leo Fender was an innovator. The last innovation FMIC (as CBS) did for bass guitar was the ill fated Bass V in 1965. And id like them to bring that back, with a bridge that can handle a low B.

I agree, and with a full scale neck. Why?
Because IMO the PU arangement would give the best EQ of the output
 

Attachments

  • fender-bass-v.jpg
    fender-bass-v.jpg
    53.4 KB · Views: 15
Every company does not have to do everything.

Fender does well at what they do. If sales were poor and a major part of the market share was fanned frets, I am sure they'd go there. But I don't think they need to at this point. My guess is that fanned frets are a very small fraction of overall sales of all guitars and basses.

As previously mentioned, I only think it might become a thing if one of their famous endorsers requested it.
 
Funny you mention, the first Fender Marauders had fanned frets in the 60's

Some of the Marauder protoypes had slanted frets: every string was the same scale, the frets weren't fanned. I can't find a pic of any of the Marauder prototypes with slanted frets, but here's an an example of slanted frets from Ibanez:View attachment 5458873 :

By all means (plus, I'm also into balanced tension and strings of more flexible design). Was just wondering e-loud about the ins and outs, as I wrote.


I've only seen online textual mention of some Fender Marauder prototypes having slanted frets (can't seem to find a single confounded picture of one!).
Note that slanted=/=fanned: they may have been diagonal, for more supposed ergonomy, but still parallel and, if so, it was the same thing as the later (1973-1984) Rickenbacker 481
Rickenbacker 481 | Vintage Guitar® magazine
[EDIT - @ardgedee beat me up to it.]

Circa 1966. Four (of eight) made with slant frets.

IMG_20240525_215903.jpg
 
Because people have - sometimes very strong - opinions about issues that don't affect them directly and personally but do affect them ideologically. Why are so many people (males too) pro or contra abortion? They are surely not affected personally and directly but, they believe, ideologically and obviously indirectly. And this is enough for them to have a strong opinion on the matter at hand. Ideology is a very strong motivator for some people.

I can see why people who can't give birth are against abortion. I think being against a Fender fanned fret bass is more similar to people who are against their favorite movies being remade or people who are against gyro-aiming being an option in video games. Makes absolutely no sense to Herrick.

If Fender ever made one, I'd be interested in checking one out as I never got along with their standard 5-string Pees.
 
Fender is a lot like Harley Davidson. They do two or three things pretty well since the 1950s 1960s and are not partial to change.
Some of their great basses that no longer exist...
Roscoe Beck V
Steve Bailey VI
Player Jazz V (with the double jazz pickups).
Dimension IV and V
Reggie Hamilton
Etc.
If they ever do come out with a fanned fret grab it quick cause it will be discontinued immediately.
Wait 6 months for blow out prices
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jefenator
While I understand the enthusiasm for novel designs, this thread is overlooking a few facts about Fender and basses in general.

First, their bass business is barely a flea on a dog compared to their guitar business. We are lucky if they do anything unusual AT ALL for us. The odds of Fender getting interested in some modern bass design are vanishingly small. What is their business model? They barely care about making basses to begin with.

Second, can anyone actually ID different basses, and specifically fanned vs regular frets, in a studio blind test? I get it that players have their prefs. Good on each and everyone of us for those different prefs. But, from an audience perspective, they all sound like basses.

Third, there are already builders building fanned fret instruments. Why does Fender need to make them? If you want one, then get it from Dingwall etc. If you show up at an audition with a Fender, the players will notice the Fender on the headstock. They generally won't notice if you have some advanced design going on.

Anyhow….
 

Latest posts