• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Performer Build

The Fender Performer Bass

From Fender:


"Performer Bass (1986-1987). Distinctively pointy shapes continued in the mid-1980s with the Performer guitar and bass models, which were second only to the Katana models in non-traditional Fender design. 1986’s angular Performer Bass boasted a slim two-octave neck, unusually deep cutaways and dual single-coil pickups. It was available in two versions—the less expensive ($499) Japanese-made Standard Performer Bass, which had a rosewood fingerboard and white pickguard, and the more expensive ($949) U.S.-made Elite Performer Bass, which had an ebony fingerboard and no pickguard. Fender Custom Shop founder John Page, the creator of the Performer instruments, designed a five-string version of the bass in 1987 that never made it past the prototype stage. Although it didn’t catch on with players and it too suffered from Fender’s post-CBS instability of the mid-1980s, the Performer Bass nonetheless had notable strengths and was a well-conceived attempt at a modern direction for Fender basses quite apart from the long-established Precision/Jazz tradition. It was discontinued after only a year. Performer basses are regarded today as a something of a curiosity, albeit interesting and well-built ones, and they command high prices in the infrequent instances when they show up for sale."

And a post from John Page from fender.com:


"Yes the Performer was one of my designs. Believe it or not, the Performer bass (designed before the guitar) was designed to be the Elite version of the Jazz Bass.. yes that's right... it was going to be the top version of the Jazz Bass... scary huh? The shape of the instrument is derivative of the back of the Strat Look at the waist cut on the back of the Strat and you'll see where the basic horn/body shape started. At the time (1982-3ish?) I was designing this, Fender was considered a pretty conservative instrument Kramer, Jackson & BC Rich were building these radically styled instruments, so we wanted to get into that market. In my original design, it used a Strat-style peg-head and the pickups were a double Strat hum-bucking setup. I also designed the Fender Logo On The Performer I can't say that that a good thing, but it was kinda cool to design a new Fender logo. We got some comments that it looked like the Peavey logo, which really pissed me off. The guitar that was produced was different than the original that I designed. I initially designed it to be made in the US, but it ended up being made in Japan. When that transition happened, things were changed. The peg-head went from the Strat to the Swinger, for example, so I don't remember what pickup they actually went with. I angled the pickups to thicken up the top end a bit... and it looked cool. Well, at least to me, I like "off-line aesthetics". Why weren't they successful? Look, I was a designer in Fender R&D for years before I started the CS. I was always trying to design something new and different. When we started the CS, I tried to do the same. Reality is, the public wants Strats, Teles, P & J basses from Fender. So it's really tough to get them to accept any "new & different" designs in any great quantities. I'm afraid I have no idea how many were actually produced.

I designed the five string version when I first came back to start the CS in '87. To the best of my knowledge there was only one prototype made by Fuji Gen Gakki It was kind of a pinkish color and had the same basic features of the 4 string Japanese model. When I initially designed both basses, they were modified Mustang coils, wound beefier and wired to be hum-bucking. When the four string version was released it used a single coil p/u under each cover. The original also was designed with a angular/massive/fine-tuning bridge, and a "lightning bolt" styled string tree. Both were prototyped but never released. I never heard of any instruments being destroyed for any legal issues... maybe another one of those "legends"? The idea behind the neck was simple, at the time a lot of bass players were guitar player converts. Bass playing style started to have more of a "lead guitar" approach, so the idea of a narrower neck was to help along those lines. The original proto went on the summer before it was released with the then "hottest" bands, Billy Idol (I don't remember his bass player's name) and The CARS bass player, Ben Orr."


OK, so many of you know me as one of the "resident" medium scalers around here and if you paid attention, even casually - you know that I have been gassing for a LONG time for a Fender Performer in medium scale.

The truth is - in the grand scheme of custom bass building - this will be a pretty simple and straight forward "replica" type build. Nothing revolutionary, nothing groundbreaking - the creativity will reside in the more subtle areas and the devil will be in the details:

asset-m-104_5423983357EE41D0A495CE66A0B1B528.jpg


You can call this bass #17, or #9 in the Fender Collection.

Fender-Collection.png

As I have been doing the planning and the designing around this project - I have had the good fortune to be inspired by a number of good folks on this board.

I like to give credit where credit is due so I want to take a moment to thank those who have been influential and even inspirational in my approach to this project.

The first shout out goes to JIO whose Performer "Supersonic" build was not only remarkable but incredibly inspirational. To be honest, his headstock smokes the original Performer headstock and he - IMHO - made a number of improvements over the original design. If you are even vaguely a Performer fan and you haven't seen this build for yourself, you should proceed here, without further ado and check out his work:

http://www.talkbass.com/threads/custom-performer-supersonic-bass.904968/

I would also like to give a shout out to mapleglo, who also made her version of a Fender Performer, once again remarkably cool and incredibly inspirational. While you are at it, check out all of their builds. They are both wonderful builders. The thread on her Performer build is here, with a big heartfelt "thanks" to both of you.:

http://www.talkbass.com/threads/first-build-performer-copy.1013458/

The next shout out goes to the man himself John Page - who was a founder of the Fender Custom Shop in the mid-eighties - and was the original creator of both the Fender Performer Bass AND the original Stu Hamm Urge I medium scale bass. I have been in touch with John and gave John Page Guitars every opportunity to actually build this bass for me as a tribute to his work while he was in the Fender Custom Shop. I gently prodded him from time to time and he never said no, but always told me to check back with him. Very recently he told me it would be quite a while due to the number of new designs he was in the middle of - and if I found someone to help with the build I should move ahead. He DID express a genuine desire to help with the process which I greatly appreciated and asked that I send photos. Unfortunately, time was not on my side when it came to John and his busy schedule but I am delighted and amazed that in his own way he gave the project his "blessing".

An additional shout out needs to go out to the Fender Squier Katana bass. I was convinced that I could find one of these rare medium scale birds at a decent price - to rob the neck off of. I also realized that if I could find the neck on the cheap, this bass could be built for a very reasonable price. Unfortunately or fortunately, however you want to look at it - I was unable to find a Fender or Squier Katana bass at a reasonable price. I was hoping to find one with a trashed body so that I could save a few bucks and abandon the body with little or no guilt. The Katana headstock seems like a medium scale replica of the full scale Fender Performer headstock:

1D43E4E1-F780-4B9E-AB5A-10F21A8A9A30-11227-0000078AEFCD5380.jpg
p5_uzalhgapc_so.jpg

The Katana only had 21 frets while the Performer has a full two-octave neck at 24 frets. In the end, I couldn't live with this discrepancy and mostly as a tribute to John Page I decided to really try and nail this one in his honor with a full two-octave neck.

The last shout out goes out to Bruce Johnson who as far as I can tell - builds custom neck/truss rod systems and neck blanks for a number of builders, including at times for my friend Pat Wilkins. Bruce noticed a posting I had on here, and recommended a talented luthier in Los Angeles named Keith Horne. Keith does custom work for a number of folks and was very receptive and excited about doing a Fender Performer replica in medium scale.

I can't really post this in the "Luthier's Corner" as I am not technically the builder. I suppose Keith as the builder could post as we go, but I didn't want to bother or burden him with this - but he has agreed to send photos as things progress. So, I hope it is alright with the mods and you good TBer's that I continue to post progress right here in this thread in the "Bass" section.

The first issue that Keith and I spoke about was the issue of the neck. Although JIO and mapleglo improved dramatically on the headstock in my opinion, I decided that I wanted to stay in keeping with the tribute to John Page and keep the original headstock shape. It's a weird headstock and hard to love, not nearly as George Jetson as JIO's - but I have become more and more enamored with it as we go.

Also as a tribute to John, we decided to use my Stu Hamm prototype medium scale neck design as our basic guide for the neck. As far as I know, it is the ONLY Fender medium scale production neck ever made with two full octaves.

Keith asked me to measure the neck and I provided all of the measurements that he asked for. I work with Illustrator a lot and find it extremely accurate when making things actual size. Here is the template that i provided for Keith, basically the Stu Hamm neck with a reduced version of the Performer headstock. Of course, we have to round off the end of the fingerboard end at the body - instead of leaving it straight as this one appears:

Performer-NeckHeadstock1.png


We are not downsizing the body, but are going with the full size Performer body in one piece alder. Keith sent me shots of two different pieces of alder he found and purchased today and I picked this one:

20140919_061757.jpg


I have decided on rear rout and no pickguard, more like the elusive Performer Elite - which we ALL wish we could have seen photos of. Rather than 3 pickups like the elite, I will stay with two.

And here is the maple for the neck:

IMG_3515B.jpg

Some figure and some flame, not too much, just right for the period, I think....

I managed to find the same tuners which are ultra-lights:

3178.jpg


And I always like the Fender Vintage bridge on the medium scalers in case you have to play around slightly with the string spacing:

Screen shot 2014-09-19 at 11.43.57 PM.png


I also sent Keith a neck plate, strap buttons and a string tree. I am going with all chrome hardware but all black screws, including the neck plate and bridge screws, even the screws for the bridge barrels are black, and black screws for the chrome strap buttons. I think it will dress it up a little and hopefully make it stand out a bit.

As we all know, with trying to replicate the original Performers the great challenges and the magic lies in the pickups, the pickup covers, the decal and the control knobs. Still trying to decide if we should use a micro tilt kit on the neck like the original. Stay tuned.

BassHappy
www.innertainment.net
 
Last edited:
I've been waiting for you to start talking about this. I am very interested. And I didn't realize that the Performer and the Urge I were designed by the same guy. Thanks for that.

Question: Is your neck picture/mock-up correct? If I am looking at it right, it says 16" at the 11th fret.
 
I've been waiting for you to start talking about this. I am very interested. And I didn't realize that the Performer and the Urge I were designed by the same guy. Thanks for that.

Question: Is your neck picture/mock-up correct? If I am looking at it right, it says 16" at the 11th fret.

OMG WV

Thanks so much for catching that. Keith was getting ready to start the templates. I sent the new one just now and I hope he has been working on the body.
I really appreciate it. If you are ever in NY I owe you a lunch WV! TB is just the greatest!

Here is the corrected one, not quite to proper scale of course:

Fender-Performer-Hamm-NeckTB.png


Will let you know where we are with everything when I get an update from Keith!

I know what you mean about the headstock Splods - but I admit it is taking a while - but it is growing on me in a good way.

Thanks again!

BassHappy
www.innertainment.net
 
Last edited:
I like the pointy headstock. Not meant to be offensive, but the ridiculousness of it is great. I mean, Fender's headstock shape is a hallmark of the brand. For them to throw that out the window and do the pointy Performer headstock is, well, ridiculous. Anyone who didn't know about the Performer and the Katana would probably think it was a fake. And in this case, the ridiculous headstock completes the whole "George Jetson" vibe perfectly. The Performer is one of my favorite "non-traditional" designs ever, because it is IMO a risky, dare-to-be-great design.
 
I like the pointy headstock. Not meant to be offensive, but the ridiculousness of it is great. I mean, Fender's headstock shape is a hallmark of the brand. For them to throw that out the window and do the pointy Performer headstock is, well, ridiculous. Anyone who didn't know about the Performer and the Katana would probably think it was a fake. And in this case, the ridiculous headstock completes the whole "George Jetson" vibe perfectly. The Performer is one of my favorite "non-traditional" designs ever, because it is IMO a risky, dare-to-be-great design.

Thanks for that too WV. I probably would like it better if I would have never seen JIO's headstock! But as you say, it is definitely ridiculous and I want to stay true to the original there. Also, I met Stu - as my drummer Ron Riddle toured with him right after the Hamm Urge I came out - early '90's I believe. I was enamored with Stu's Urge I bass at the time and mine is either a prototype or an employee build. The body is a little small and light, and not among my favorites - but I pick up that bass often because of the neck. I love it.

PICKUPS AND PICKUP COVERS

OK, so let's go down the list on the pickup issues. For starters, I don't really care much for the sound of the Performer Bass pickups. They are barely OK and that is about it as far as I am concerned. This is one area where I just can't stay with the original design but need to make a substantial improvement. I want this thing to bark. I have my theory about them, right or wrong. You should know, I don't own a Performer bass only played one a long time ago. I do not intend to buy one to rob parts off of either.

What happened is that John basically built a few prototypes, sent whatever he sent to them in Japan, and they did what they did on the production models. He isn't even sure about some of the final production detail decisions the Japanese made. He wasn't really involved. His original pickup concept was to use the Mustang bass pickups. Now, on these basses, the pickups were actually glued into the pickup covers with epoxy, so they are not removable or swappable, probably not without damaging them. If the Mustang bass pickups were used, the Mustang split coils would have to be seriously modified or combined into a single pickup instead of the Mustang split coil. I know the pickup covers have a bit of an odd shape, but there is no way a stock Mustang split coil would ever fit under there. I played around with actual size mock ups and I don't think it is possible. What I think happened, is that they used a Strat pickup frame and wound the pickups to Mustang bass specs. I also think the pickups may have been 6 pole guitar pickups. I am speculating here, and I hope someone in the know will read this and clarify this for me. My theory is that they moved - more or less - to a Musicmaster type pickup (which were 6 pole Strat frames) and beefed it up a little with Mustang spec windings. Again, total speculation on my part, and John isn't even sure - but the Musicmaster style pickups would fit just fine under those covers. I would imagine a few good folks along the way have figured out how to get the pickups - whatever they were - out of the covers without ruining them - but I don't know of anyone who has. I would say after careful consideration - I am not sure that John's idea of Mustang pickups made it into the final production run at all - I would put my nickel on the pickups being a version of the Musicmaster 6-pole pickups.

So in trying my best to find a round peg that will fit into a round hole, I have found several Musicmaster bass-type pickups, exactly Musicmaster size, but four pole and optimized for bass. Aero makes one:

Aero.png


And Chris Novak makes one:

Screen shot 2014-09-14 at 10.50.11 AM.png


Aero also makes a nice Mustang bass replacement pickup as does Nordstrom, but as previously stated, I don't think they will fit properly under the covers. Since this is pretty much a standard Strat pickup frame, I am sure the folks at Duncan and other places, would whip up something custom - which like the Novak above - would be a Strat size version of a P Bass pickup. I have Duncans, and have many of the basses covered sonically, so having the Aeros or the Novak's as another color in the palette is appealing. I am thinking possibly one Aero and one Novak, but I want to talk to both of them. If they can modify bridge vs. neck I might get both from the same folks for continuity. The other consideration is the bridge and making sure you are optimizing the pickup pole placement with respect to string spacing. I believe we have enough "play" in the Fender Vintage bridge to compensate and be sure the strings go directly over each pole.

Again, here are the original covers:

p1.jpg


The other option is to veer off the path and use the Delano ovals in white. They are a little big, but they would look nice, and have gotten pretty amazing reviews - but if possible, I still would like to stay with the original pickup covers:

Screen shot 2014-09-14 at 11.12.57 AM.png


If I use the Aero's or Novak's above, I could always score the standard Fender pickup covers below, but again, I would much prefer to use the original Performer Bass pickup covers.

Musicmaster.png


The other option I read about everywhere is the use of Strat "rail" pickups. People rave about them, but they are built into their own covers and I don't believe would fit under the Performer Bass pickup covers. Plus, although Musicamasters with Hot Rails get rave reviews, it is still a Strat guitar pickup and to me the Aero or Novak is a better solution.

So to me, these are the options. If anyone can think of something I haven't please chime in. The pickup covers are much smaller than they look and a standard P bass single coil would never fit for sure.

KNOBS

Screen shot 2014-09-13 at 10.06.51 AM.png


So that brings one to - Where in the world am I going to find a couple of Fender Performer Bass pickup covers and three knobs that are in GREAT shape, without buying a Performer bass? Well, I am working on it. I am thinking (and so is Keith) that if we can rent a pickup cover and a knob in good shape somewhere, we might be able to duplicate them on a 3-D printer. I have feelers out to a few people, and I will put another feeler out here. I would be more than happy to leave a sizable deposit on my credit card for someone who would provide me each of these for a short time. I would then return them in the same shape I got them in and certainly throw you some cash for your trouble. I see the knobs for a rather salty $40 bucks a piece but they are usually far from perfect. You know me. I am a virgin guy. Like to be the one and the only one to break that baby in and at times - I find that simply striving for perfection can bring it's own rewards.

I guess this is it for now. Any suggestions or comments which fall under the category of preserving John Page's original Fender Performer creation - are welcome!

Happy Sunday! While the weather is still decent - I am smoking a big 8 lb bird today, with some potato pancakes in honor of Oktoberfest - and HOPEFULLY watching my Colts destroy Jacksonville.

images.jpeg


BassHappy
www.innertainment.net
 
Last edited:
I know what I'd do.... use Strat rail pickups. Three of 'em! There's a LOT of different types to choose from, single coils, humbuckers, split-able, and you could experiment quite a bit. They'll work fine, especially for medium scale... just don't TELL them they're transducing bass strings. Lots of cool basses have semi-modified guitar pickups in them, like some Rics.

If I were really wanting to do something along the "elite" boutique-ish route, I'd go natural finish on the bass and make custom pickup covers and knobs from a very white wood... like holly.

That old-school bridge will be an anachronism on this futuristic-styled bass.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: blindrabbit
Hey MR

Thanks so much for the feedback. I think if I were going to get away from the original design completely - and use three pickups, I would go the lipstick route. Who knows, if I can't dig up the original pickup covers somewhere it is an option as is the rails. Good idea to make the pickup covers and knobs out of white wood.

The Fender neck on the Performers was very narrow. Looks like a taller version of a very standard Fender bridge to me.

p17.jpg


p17.jpg
Screen shot 2014-09-19 at 11-1.43.57 PM.png


What bridge would you suggest? I was thinking of swapping out the bridge plate for a Mustang one but it is not squared off.

007-9355-000.jpg


I could always use my barrels to insure the proper string spacing. I guess I could have a custom bridge plate made and duplicate the one on the Performer.

Taking it all in.....

Best,

BassHappy
www.innertainment.net
 
Last edited:
Good question on the bridge.
After looking around, it appears that Hipshot offers narrower string spacing bass bridge, maybe there are some others that have adjustable side-to-side string spacing.

I'm not a fan of those individual string bridges, but those would definitely work, too.

http://store.hipshotproducts.com/cart.php?m=product_list&c=3
 
Good question on the bridge.
After looking around, it appears that Hipshot offers narrower string spacing bass bridge, maybe there are some others that have adjustable side-to-side string spacing.

I'm not a fan of those individual string bridges, but those would definitely work, too.

http://store.hipshotproducts.com/cart.php?m=product_list&c=3

Hey MR

It is certainly a debatable point - but as a tribute to John, I am really interested in staying as close to his design as possible. I would consider getting a new bridge plate, if I could find one 1/4" or so taller. I would then use the parts and longer screws from my bridge and duplicate the holes on the original, etc. I am not interested in straying from his design after thinking about it - with respect to the bridge. Not interested in a Hipshot. To duplicate the original bridge would probably be the most satisfying for me. After all, if the Fender bridge was good enough for the original, it is good enough for my replica.

Some would say it is fine as a tribute to someone to give them a nod and then simply build your own version - in your estimation, improving on the design as best you can. That is noble and basically is what JIO and mapleglo have done, and YES, in several ways both of them in my opinion improved on John's original design.

I have done that in certain instances, but that is not the idea here. With the exception of the actual pickups, I would like to duplicate his work as closely as possible, except also of course - for the medium scale neck.

That is just me and this particular project...

But thanks for your input and suggestions they are welcome - and at least for now - everything is still on the table.


Best,

BassHappy
www.innertainment.net
 
Last edited:
That's one part on the Performer I never considered. (the bridge) It appears that it was made only for that bass (being so narrow) - never seen that bridge used on any other Fender bass (was it used on the Katana?). There was the 3 bolt plate from '83-'93 but it was really wide spacing. Since you're going replica - I'd seek out a older/vintage plate like it from some other maker (Ibanez?, Kramer?). It's exhausting studying many basses to see one that could sit-in - or... being a bent plate, it could be fabricated and chromed fairly easily through a machine shop. It's pretty basic - just need correct measurements/dimentions. It will probably end up costing what some high-end bridge like a Babicz cost, but it would remain true to your goal of authentic replica.
 
That's one part on the Performer I never considered. (the bridge) It appears that it was made only for that bass (being so narrow) - never seen that bridge used on any other Fender bass (was it used on the Katana?). There was the 3 bolt plate from '83-'93 but it was really wide spacing. Since you're going replica - I'd seek out a older/vintage plate like it from some other maker (Ibanez?, Kramer?). It's exhausting studying many basses to see one that could sit-in - or... being a bent plate, it could be fabricated and chromed fairly easily through a machine shop. It's pretty basic - just need correct measurements/dimentions. It will probably end up costing what some high-end bridge like a Babicz cost, but it would remain true to your goal of authentic replica.

Hey JIO

I think fabricating it and having it chromed would be the way to go. The smaller height of the bridge plate on my Fender Vintage bridge doesn't bother me as much as the screw hole placement being wrong.

I like the string spacing on the Hamm, so by default with that neck being duplicated - I can't go the exact narrowness of the Performer at the bridge. It will be very close and hard to tell the difference, but won't be precise.

I have spent a lot of time already looking at different bridge plates and the problem is ALWAYS the screw hole placement. So, I will see about a custom bridge plate. I already have to make a custom neck plate because they don't make a standard 4 bolt PLAIN (no F logo) neck plate with a micro tilt hole.

DSC_0014_34.jpg

I can get the same shop to do it and probably save a few bucks if I go that route.

Here is the Katana bridge - not the same, not squared off on the corners and not as tall.

Katana Bridge.jpg
 
Last edited:
I ran up against the replica vs tribute debate (my own) building my early '66 dot/bound Jazz. A few things strayed from replica; I used split-coil pu's (Fender Super 55's), my nut-slot runs thru the binding, an ebony tug-bar, and no Fender stamped tuner plates. Otherwise it's pretty authentic and looks and sounds great! Pat finished the neck and did a faint amber clear coat on the Oly white hs just like the vintage basses age to. I'm happy to call it a tribute and just play it. Oh, and being a MIM Fender "60's vintage" body, the bass weighs in more at 70's J's weight. (10lbs!)

I have these 2 knobs that you can have if only for the rubber wraps. However, being from the 80's the rubber is breaking down. One is 98% in tact (splitting has started) and the other as you can see has split/separated. I know you need 3, but if you want the 2, pm me your address and I'll send them to you. These chrome knobs are strange as they were attached permanently to the pots. (?!?) and could never figure out why. One of Fenders 80's ideas that luckily didn't have legs. I think they were from an early 80's Precision Elite.

IMG_7083_zps20b50ae9.jpg
 
I ran up against the replica vs tribute debate (my own) building my early '66 dot/bound Jazz. A few things strayed from replica; I used split-coil pu's (Fender Super 55's), my nut-slot runs thru the binding, an ebony tug-bar, and no Fender stamped tuner plates. Otherwise it's pretty authentic and looks and sounds great! Pat finished the neck and did a faint amber clear coat on the Oly white hs just like the vintage basses age to. I'm happy to call it a tribute and just play it. Oh, and being a MIM Fender "60's vintage" body, the bass weighs in more at 70's J's weight. (10lbs!)

I have these 2 knobs that you can have if only for the rubber wraps. However, being from the 80's the rubber is breaking down. One is 98% in tact (splitting has started) and the other as you can see has split/separated. I know you need 3, but if you want the 2, pm me your address and I'll send them to you. These chrome knobs are strange as they were attached permanently to the pots. (?!?) and could never figure out why. One of Fenders 80's ideas that luckily didn't have legs. I think they were from an early 80's Precision Elite.

IMG_7083_zps20b50ae9.jpg

Hey JIO

Thanks so much for the generous offer. I have a couple of sources for knobs (they also used them on the USA Strats and the Elite Teles for a couple of years) so I am treading water for a minute to see how that goes.

But these could be helpful for sure if I have to do my own.

Yeah, it's always a tough thing to decide where to draw the line on certain issues. I have to draw a line with the pickups - just not enamored with the sound - and if you don't like the sound what is the point of having the bass?

By the way, I heard from Keith and all is good, he hadn't started on the neck template yet. Thanks again to WV for the head's up!

BassHappy
 
  • Like
Reactions: JIO
BassHappy... Whatever you decide, it will be your own personal vision of the Performer.

I love seeing all the different takes on the concept, some more true to the original, some just using the general appearance of that angular body and tweaking it some, all very good in concept and execution.

Man, this makes ME want to do one. Just like when I saw that custom-painted Turquoise bass, I just KNEW I had to try that myself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BassHappy
A couple of you have asked about Keith so I wanted to show you some of his builds. He does a lot of the work for the guitarviol now - a very interesting, clever and unique instrument here:

http://www.togamanguitars.com/

Here are a few photos of instruments he built:

580785_10202403715556903_255439513_n.jpg


1011607_10201668986269130_867162892_n.jpg


1471800_10202547369668166_1831207059_n.jpg


10568855_10204436092405054_1582753084023137984_n.jpg


Here is a video demo. This is a big reason why I wanted to get Keith involved in the build, he is quite a craftsman!



I am so glad to have him on board for this project

BassHappy
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JIO
So Keith sent me the body template and the tracing, here they are - making nice progress:

View attachment 482322View attachment 482323

Special thanks to JIO for allowing me to "borrow" his original template - although he ended up modifying his and I am going stock.

BassHappy

well.., a few generations of borrowing!;) I used the fuzzy reproduction of John Pages blueprint in Klaus Blasquiz's The Fender Bass book from 1990 to get me close. I've never held an actual Performer so I used a copy machine until it was close to 'actual' size. (in the more or less dept) In his book, KB has copy next to it stating it was made in Japan for one year, 1987. Most everything I've read since sez mid year '85 to mid year '86. Questions abound! As both the (Fender badged) Performer and (Squier badged) Katana were both made in Japan (probably side by side), it's curious why they they weren't both badged Fender. A marketing decision most likely. As has been written, the Fender peeps had aspirations that the Performer was to be the 'Elite' Jazz bass, so a Fender badge was appropriate there. Did they not want to associate the Fender name as solidly for the radical (for them) Katana design?

To throw in one more interesting Performer related tidd-bit… this pic is from the August 2014 Bass Player magazine page 54 heading an article about Paul Gagon. He worked at Fender ('78-'84) starting as a repair tech and soon afterwards moved into R&D. He designed the pre-amp/pu's for the '83 Elite Precision and also the Performer. The pic is from 1983 and the 'prototype' Performer has what appears to be the thinner Fender style hs w/Schaller deluxe tuners that were later used on the early 90's Plus series. And in a gutsy beyond-the-valley-of-Burgundy-Mist pink colour! (love to know where that bass ended up!)

IMG_7094_zps49968277.jpg