• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Precision or G&L LB-100?

I liked the #7, more so than the #8, which is the popular one. Felt too thin to me. But give me the vintage radius any day of the week...


Vintage radius for me too. I suspect that's why the RW 50s bass worked for me. Well, that and it's a thinner profile. It's just a wide neck.

The pickup placement on the LB is a bit toward the bridge compared to a Fender. Subsequently, the LB pickup was spec'd to 10,500 turns (versus standard 10,000 turns on Fender) to compensate for the placement, particularly in the mids. So, essentially the pickup is 5% overwound.



Interesting. I didn't know the pickup was moved a bit towards the bridge. I suppose that makes sense given the extra fret, they must have moved it for aesthetics so the pickup still looked centered.

Anyway, that explains to a degree what I noticed with the tone of my LB-100 when I had it. It's definitely a bit brighter.

The other factor is that I was comparing it to a Geezer equipped P which is overwound to like 12-13k.

I did know the pickup is closer to the bridge on the SB-1s.
 
Last edited:
Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I'm curious as to everyone's opinions on a Tribute LB-100 vs. an MIM Standard P. I want a natural finish bass and they currently offer the Tribute LB's in natural. I would eventually throw an MFD pickup in it because I love the sound of them but I don't have the money to buy a USA one or find a used one in my area.
 
I prefer the tribute G&L in theory — but you have to play the bass to see if you want it. I've played both and there is some different from one to the next so you could get a great Fender or a bad G&L. In a mix they will sound similar. With a MFD they will sound killer. The Tribute body shape is slightly more to my liking, and the upper fret access is better. A good MIM will play well too. If you mail order either, be sure to do or get a decent setup before judging the instrument. Obviously, the Fender says Fender.
 
By-pass the G&L Fender stress game and get yourself a Squire CV 70's P. I've owned tons of vintage P's and these 70's CV's are ridiculously good...low action, thumpy PU's...it almost doesnt need to be better.
 
I can't think of anything a P can do better than a G&L, its the direct evolution of the P by the guy who invented it. Get a P if you like tinkering with off the shelf compatible parts, or just want to sound and look like everybody else. Get a G&L if you want a rock solid workhorse that's already been "improved" by Leo Fender, no further tinkering required. I've had my G&L L2000 since 1983, literally zero problems in all those years, built like a tank, original frets barely worn, a survivor and it can sound like almost anything.
Very well put my friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gilmourisgod
Well Ive just watched the LB100 Ed Freidland vid and as usual he does a very fine job indeed...but...it sounds just a bit too refined for my taste. I kinda like the awkward charm P basses have.....Quiet E strings, unevenness across the board...not to pushy in the upper mids. Even my new CV70 feels like a pair of old jeans, the G&L just seems almost too perfect.
Having said that I'd still like to try one, who knows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ricky Rioli