• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Rumble Club

When I added another 210 to my rig, I too got a similar effect, it seemed 'bigger'. Hard to describe. I think part of it is the amp sees 4 ohms and goes into 'mighty mode'.:D
"Part" of it is true, the difference between 350w and 500w is less of an impact than just the addition of more speakers. To get 3dB more than 350w you need to go up to 700w, but adding that 15" is about another 3dB on its own, plus maybe another 1.5dB from the extra 150w. The second cab makes the bigger part of the difference vs just the 4ohm wattage bump. And the fact that the combo is raised off the ground.

I like the 112 cab myself, the 115 doesent fit in the back of the car, and triggers "gotta turn one sideways" ocd, as well as added boom, but the boom is wanted by many, so I can't knock it.

The ocd and compactness, and lucking out to get one from @honeyiscool semi locally, led me to the 112. Been very happy with the sound, it is almost like having another 115 in the combo size box sound wise... Almost. But it balances perfectly probably because of the low mounted ports, and fact that it is coupled to the ground while the 15 is raised up. Best stand for a 200 or 500 that money can buy in my opinion.
IMG_20160531_194730335.jpg
 
Hello Fellow Fender Rumblers (FFRs)!!

So after spending almost two week perusing this thread (and some others Rumble related), I was converted and I've pulled the trigger on the Rumble 112 cab V3 (on its way from Thomann).
My intention is to have a two 112 rig with an amp head (don't like combos).
I'm hesitating between the 200 and the 500 head.
Right now, I have a GK MB800 (was on sale!!) paired with a GK MBE210, nice but not optimal. I really think I'd need another cab to get the full potential of the GK MB800.
But, here the cabinet offering is somewhat sparse to say the least. The MBE210 cab is EOL so no second one, and for that reason it will stay home as a practice/backup cab.

Therefore, I went with the 112 because it's light, not expensive and according to what you can read here, very powerful yet subtle cab. All-in-all it offers a very good price/performance ratio.
So my question is which amp head would you recommend to pair with 2x112 v3? the 200 or the 500? and why?

Gig-wise I'm in two bands. In one band, the drummer is very loud (but I'm working on him to be more gentle). The second drummer is ok.

Let me add that this thread is a gold mine of information. Fender should thank you
Thank you
 
Hello Fellow Fender Rumblers (FFRs)!!

So after spending almost two week perusing this thread (and some others Rumble related), I was converted and I've pulled the trigger on the Rumble 112 cab V3 (on its way from Thomann).
My intention is to have a two 112 rig with an amp head (don't like combos).
I'm hesitating between the 200 and the 500 head.
Right now, I have a GK MB800 (was on sale!!) paired with a GK MBE210, nice but not optimal. I really think I'd need another cab to get the full potential of the GK MB800.
But, here the cabinet offering is somewhat sparse to say the least. The MBE210 cab is EOL so no second one, and for that reason it will stay home as a practice/backup cab.

Therefore, I went with the 112 because it's light, not expensive and according to what you can read here, very powerful yet subtle cab. All-in-all it offers a very good price/performance ratio.
So my question is which amp head would you recommend to pair with 2x112 v3? the 200 or the 500? and why?

Gig-wise I'm in two bands. In one band, the drummer is very loud (but I'm working on him to be more gentle). The second drummer is ok.

Let me add that this thread is a gold mine of information. Fender should thank you
Thank you
For only $100 price difference, the 500 is the way to go. Use caution if you ever use only one cab with it, but as a user of a 200c +112 I can say that all those times I thought I had a bunch of power on tap, I really was running at the verge of running out of headroom. If it is rock and you ever have to fill a bigger room or outdoor area with no support, you will be glad to have the extra power.

That being said, the 200 can handle most gig situations in small bars with no support, or larger stages with support.
 
So after spending almost two week perusing this thread (and some others Rumble related), I was converted and I've pulled the trigger on the Rumble 112 cab V3
Welcome to the Fender Rumble Club @raphaeld :woot:
So my question is which amp head would you recommend to pair with 2x112 v3? the 200 or the 500? and why?
Your MB800 strikes me as pure overkill, but give that a go. If you really need the watts, then the Rumble 500 is an easy choice. Plus I like the classic Fender tone that Rumble delivers.
Let me add that this thread is a gold mine of information. Fender should thank you
Thank you
You are most welcome @raphaeld. I am glad this thread helped you. My main contact at Fender has thanked me privately and unofficially.
:cool: Rumble On! :cool:
 
For only $100 price difference, the 500 is the way to go. Use caution if you ever use only one cab with it, but as a user of a 200c +112 I can say that all those times I thought I had a bunch of power on tap, I really was running at the verge of running out of headroom. If it is rock and you ever have to fill a bigger room or outdoor area with no support, you will be glad to have the extra power.

That being said, the 200 can handle most gig situations in small bars with no support, or larger stages with support.

Thanks Ubernator, that reinforced my belief. The 200 will certainly be struggling with 2x112 anyway. So the 500 head it will be.

Welcome to the Fender Rumble Club @raphaeld :woot:

Your MB800 strikes me as pure overkill, but give that a go. If you really need the watts, then the Rumble 500 is an easy choice. Plus I like the classic Fender tone that Rumble delivers.
You are most welcome @raphaeld. I am glad this thread helped you. My main contact at Fender has thanked me privately and unofficially.
:cool: Rumble On! :cool:


Linnin, Overkill would be an understatement :laugh::laugh:!! think of selling it and will go for a more cohesive rig, Fender Rumble 500 head + 2x112 cabs. Light, powerful and funky!!'
"Linnin, Don't Lose that Number", :bassist::bassist: Just Sayin'
Thank you Guys
 
  • Like
Reactions: Linnin
I like the Stealth Gray, and if I had one I'd put a Confederate Battle Jack in place of the black grillecloth.
Battle_flag_of_the_Confederate_States_of_America.svg_.png
What most don't know is this is not the confederate flat. It was one of the battle flags.
This is the original confederate flag.
stars.bars.gif

In a battle situation, it was difficult to distinguish from the U.S. flag. That is why they used the battle flag and why there were two subsequent versions of the official confederate flag.
The other two versions did have the "stars and bars" in the upper left corner of a white flag.
I had at least two ancestors in the confederate army, one was a chaplain and the other played fife in the fife and drum corpse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Linnin
Hello Fellow Fender Rumblers (FFRs)!!

So after spending almost two week perusing this thread (and some others Rumble related), I was converted and I've pulled the trigger on the Rumble 112 cab V3 (on its way from Thomann).
My intention is to have a two 112 rig with an amp head (don't like combos).
I'm hesitating between the 200 and the 500 head.
Right now, I have a GK MB800 (was on sale!!) paired with a GK MBE210, nice but not optimal. I really think I'd need another cab to get the full potential of the GK MB800.
But, here the cabinet offering is somewhat sparse to say the least. The MBE210 cab is EOL so no second one, and for that reason it will stay home as a practice/backup cab.

Therefore, I went with the 112 because it's light, not expensive and according to what you can read here, very powerful yet subtle cab. All-in-all it offers a very good price/performance ratio.
So my question is which amp head would you recommend to pair with 2x112 v3? the 200 or the 500? and why?

Gig-wise I'm in two bands. In one band, the drummer is very loud (but I'm working on him to be more gentle). The second drummer is ok.

Let me add that this thread is a gold mine of information. Fender should thank you
Thank you
Welcome Rumbler # 768! I would recommend the 500. You will have plenty left over for when you need it. Now order the 500 and Rumble On!
 
  • Like
Reactions: J-Bassomatic
What most don't know is this is not the confederate flat. It was one of the battle flags.
This is the original confederate flag.
stars.bars.gif

In a battle situation, it was difficult to distinguish from the U.S. flag. That is why they used the battle flag and why there were two subsequent versions of the official confederate flag.
The other two versions did have the "stars and bars" in the upper left corner of a white flag.
I had at least two ancestors in the confederate army, one was a chaplain and the other played fife in the fife and drum corpse.
The flag that you posted is the first national flag of the Confederate States of America, and was known as "The Stars and Bars". The battle jack of the Army of Northern Virginia was known as both 'The Stary Cross' or the 'The Southern Cross'.
 
The flag that you posted is the first national flag of the Confederate States of America, and was known as "The Stars and Bars". The battle jack of the Army of Northern Virginia was known as both 'The Stary Cross' or the 'The Southern Cross'.
You are correct, my mistake. It's been a while.
I actually qualify for membership in The Sons of Confederate Veterans, but I just don't have time to go to the meetings. My brother is a member.
 
And you'll be glad you did. I was in the same spot and went with the 500. Headroom is cool.
I usually have the master at 9 and gain at 10 - 11. It is plenty load enough (500c + 2x10). I like the effect the gain has on the sound of this amp. Until I got this 500c, I always thought gain was nothing more that a way to control the input level.