• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Fender Vintera Sixties Jazz Bass

Yes, Dr. Cheese!

The only Vintera instrument I've played so far, was the 50s P-bass.

It felt very good in my hands right off the bat, and sounded reasonably close to my old friend's 1965 P-bass.

A very full bass tone with just the right amount of mids and highs.

I can imagine they probably all sound good.

The one I played looked just like this:
P_bass.jpeg

I don't need another bass.

Mike
 
Love the neck on my Vintera 60's - didn't think a Jazz neck could be thinner, but there it is. I'm having a Sadowsky constructed and I'm very tempted to ask for a change order in the neck from a modern Jazz to the 60's Jazz. Either that or I gotta stop playing the Vintera.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese
These are beautiful Jazz Basses and they sound wonderfully (I particularly like the Firemist Gold one). But unless I've seen wrong, I'm annoyed by the fact that we still have to unscrew the neck to access the truss-rod. I agree and I understand that they are vintage inspired, but it's an obsolete and unpractical design that should not be seen anymore on modern day production basses, imho.
 
These are beautiful Jazz Basses and they sound wonderfully (I particularly like the Firemist Gold one). But unless I've seen wrong, I'm annoyed by the fact that we still have to unscrew the neck to access the truss-rod. I agree and I understand that they are vintage inspired, but it's an obsolete and unpractical design that should not be seen anymore on modern day production basses, imho.

Hopefully, the neck is stable, and adjustments will be infrequent.
 
Whould you recommend Vintera 60's?
I think it has to be tried first since I've read that the 60's neck may be an acquired taste. I love it, but some may find that the profile is too small even when coming from a Jazz. So to recommend it blindly, can't really do that. I think it may have a little more growl than the player series (which I also own) but the neck truss rod is a pain even though I do understand that that's the classic aspect of it. So it does have good point and bad points.

Build quality (mine is Firemist Gold) is perfect, no blemishes, no fret sprout or sharp ends - the "worst" thing I had to do was adjust the string spacing which thanks to the vintage saddles was easy since they're threaded rod.
 
These are beautiful Jazz Basses and they sound wonderfully (I particularly like the Firemist Gold one). But unless I've seen wrong, I'm annoyed by the fact that we still have to unscrew the neck to access the truss-rod. I agree and I understand that they are vintage inspired, but it's an obsolete and unpractical design that should not be seen anymore on modern day production basses, imho.
I agree it's a pain, but that's what they were trying to go for, the vintage aspect. It does make you think though about the 70s design. They really must have thought that the 3 bolt neck would have been really bad not to include it on the 70's Jazz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr. Cheese
I think it has to be tried first since I've read that the 60's neck may be an acquired taste. I love it, but some may find that the profile is too small even when coming from a Jazz. So to recommend it blindly, can't really do that. I think it may have a little more growl than the player series (which I also own) but the neck truss rod is a pain even though I do understand that that's the classic aspect of it. So it does have good point and bad points.

Build quality (mine is Firemist Gold) is perfect, no blemishes, no fret sprout or sharp ends - the "worst" thing I had to do was adjust the string spacing which thanks to the vintage saddles was easy since they're threaded rod.
Thank you for your reply. Did you try American Performer? Price difference of about 200 eur.