• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Double Bass fingerboard mod

The usual process is to plane the bevel out using a block plane or similar cutting tool, then sand the facets into a smooth radiused board. However, this sounds easier than it is... take it to a experienced technician/luthier... not a simple do-it-yourself job.

By the way, pizz and arco players use both bevelled and non-bevelled fingerboards...
 
Won't you have to have the bridge similarly arced?

EJ - most of the time I see this done, it's cats coming over from BG, the bevel feels funny so they get it removed.

SAW DE BILLY-O - after you been playing for awhile it kind of doesn't matter, as DONO says he generally doesn't notice if there's a bevel or not. You just play.
 
Ed Fuqua said:
Won't you have to have the bridge similarly arced? ...most of the time I see this done, it's cats coming over from BG, the bevel feels funny so they get it removed...
Yeah, I assumed that the bridge would have to be done too. I thought the bevel was mainly there to give "room" for the strings to be bowed and was therefore basically unnecessary if I wasn't going to use the bow. If I removed it, it would no doubt feel more "natural" coming from playing BG to it. You're right tho, I'll get used to it.

Anyway, it's too damned hot to do anything right now - 48C today (about 118F)!!!
 
Oilybill, I don't think I'd be too quick to be taking a plane to that board if I wuz you. If you're new to double bass, it's gonna feel big and wierd bevel or no bevel. Right now you have something that's playable that feels a little strange. If you go planing the bevel off the board without really knowing what you're doing you could end up with something that feels really strange that isn't playable.
 
Save yourself the trouble, because the bevel is usually preferred for pizzacato over arco, anyway.

I came from EBG two years ago and my first DB had the bevel. My second, obtained this year does not. They do feel different, but the bevel is not the most noticeable difference. I think if you had 2 identical basses with the bevel the only difference, blind folded it would be hard to tell them apart with the left hand. The plucking fingers might feel it missing a little more.
 
Silversorcerer said:
Save yourself the trouble, because the bevel is usually preferred for pizzacato over arco, anyway.



Actually the "Romberg bevel", developed bythe great cellist Bernhard Romberg a few years back, was designed to allow for a greater range of arco work. Somebody said something a while ago about the spreading of disinformation and its negative effect on this board. Who was that?
 
Jeff Bollbach said:
Silversorcerer said:
Save yourself the trouble, because the bevel is usually preferred for pizzacato over arco, anyway.



Actually the "Romberg bevel", developed bythe great cellist Bernhard Romberg a few years back, was designed to allow for a greater range of arco work. Somebody said something a while ago about the spreading of disinformation and its negative effect on this board. Who was that?

It's surprising to see the number of statements coming from novices(no insult intended, I consider myself as one) regarding basses, set-up and repair given the high qualified luthiers contributing to this board. Off course, everyone is free to speak and discussions are a good thing, but it doesn't hurt to show some humility from time to time :D
 

Latest posts