• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Flats vs. rounds

I can't hear the difference between flats & rounds.

  • Same, bro. Same.

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • I kinda can, but not in the mix, with effects and crowd noise.

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • I can hear the difference, but only if I really try.

    Votes: 5 1.8%
  • The difference is noticeable, but not wildly different.

    Votes: 49 18.1%
  • Then you need to get your ears checked, because they're totes diff.

    Votes: 193 71.2%
  • Carrots

    Votes: 12 4.4%

  • Total voters
    271
I feel like the sound of the attack is wildly different between flats and rounds. That thud you get from flats is essential to the old school R&B bass sound that so many people know and love. Not to mention the fact that they will have a faster decay when they're broken in. All of this is accentuated even more if you're using a pick. I have 2 P Basses for this very reason - one with flats, one with rounds.
 
Might be less of a difference with old rounds. I have flats on my P and J and love the sound (I like fresh flats) and especially the feel. You can’t get that flatwound feel by turning down a tone knob.
My string preferences is Sadowsky Blue Label Flats. They have a nice top end.
 
I feel like the sound of the attack is wildly different between flats and rounds. That thud you get from flats is essential to the old school R&B bass sound that so many people know and love. Not to mention the fact that they will have a faster decay when they're broken in. All of this is accentuated even more if you're using a pick. I have 2 P Basses for this very reason - one with flats, one with rounds.
Absolutely, the sound of flats with a pick (especially old ones) with the tone wide open cannot be replicated with rounds. No matter how old your rounds are there's still gonna be some zing in there if you have the treble up. You can't get that same "clicky" attack followed by a clear fundamental like you can w flats. It's one of the classic bass tones going back to the early days of the bass guitar.
 
Last edited:
You can't get that same "clicky" attack followed by a clear fundamental like you can w flats. It's one of the classic bass tones going back to the early days of the bass guitar.

I agree, and while there are many examples, the one that always pops into my head when I think of "that" sound is the bass on Brown Eyed Girl. That is what I think when I think P with flats through a B15.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wyrdlow and pbass2
Depends on the genre. There are some reggae bassists that don't change their strings for decades, if ever. On a recording I probably couldn't tell you if they were playing rounds or flats.

John Paul Jones is another example. People have debated whether he was using rounds or flats. I think the consensus is both. He had a very dark tone for a jazz bass.
 
John Paul Jones is another example. People have debated whether he was using rounds or flats. I think the consensus is both. He had a very dark tone for a jazz bass.

Another couple of examples are Roger Waters and Paul Simonon. Waters probably recorded with new Rotosound flats, which are bright for flats, and people debate on whether Simonon had fresh flats or dead-ish rounds. I always thought Simonon used rounds, but apparently the London Calling smashed bass has flats on it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Swerve
1769628531892.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: murphy
I'm sure its because of being too cheap to buy strings unless one broke when I was younger, but I kind of like not new rounds. Not completely dead, but definitely with a lot of the new brightness knocked off of them. I used Rotosounds for most of the 80s and 90s, but one thing I like about DR Hi Beams is they seem to stay in that "not new, not dead" sweet spot longer than any other string.