• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Flats vs. rounds

I can't hear the difference between flats & rounds.

  • Same, bro. Same.

    Votes: 2 0.7%
  • I kinda can, but not in the mix, with effects and crowd noise.

    Votes: 10 3.7%
  • I can hear the difference, but only if I really try.

    Votes: 5 1.8%
  • The difference is noticeable, but not wildly different.

    Votes: 49 18.1%
  • Then you need to get your ears checked, because they're totes diff.

    Votes: 193 71.2%
  • Carrots

    Votes: 12 4.4%

  • Total voters
    271
"Turn your tone down" gets you close enough in the mix. It's why I keep flats on only one bass at most.

But then I'm a roundwound guy who dials in bright aggressive tones whenever appropriate (and sometimes when inappropriate ;)). For those who prefer flats, rounds will never suffice.



Obligatory: neither my bandmates nor the audience care what kind of strings I use, but most of us want to please ourselves, so those factors then become irrelevant.
 
If I am playing them, the difference is very apparent to me. If I am listening to a recording, I think I can probably accurately distinguish between flats and fresher rounds the vast majority of the time. I think it is certainly true that there are occasions in which flats and dead rounds can be harder to distinguish on record, or possibly fresher rounds if the player is specifically trying to make them sound like flats (rolling off high end, using foam, using palm muting/thumb plucking, processing in post, etc.). Also, I think the latter supports the suggestion that rounds and flats inherently sound different rather than contradicts it; if you take rounds and try to make them sound like flats, you by necessity are admitting there is a difference that you are chasing. Conversely, I think flats almost never sound like fresh or average rounds in almost any imaginable situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coryr1000
When you leave out the extreme cases (like Bernard Edwards who played really dead rounds back then, or Steve Harris, who has his tech change the flats on his basses daily) and say that a flatwound player puts on a set and leaves it on until rust killst the strings, and really starts enjoying the strings when they start to settle an mature about a year in, and compare that person playing a well settled set to someone who really enjoys rounds and therefore replaces them every time the freshness is gone, then there is a massive difference, and it's clearly audible.

When someone tries to emulate a flatwound tone by using older rounds, dialing back the tone and/or using EQ to get closer to the flatwound tone, then it can be hard to hear the difference in a mix - as long as that person is doing a good enough job.
 
So glad my choice had the word "Totes" in it :roflmao:

Bass also has to go through an amp EQ section, power amp, and speakers of some kind....all of which affect the tone in demonstrable ways. Could you reasonably mitigate differences in a band mix with numerous adjustments? Yeah, to some degree...but other things like decay, tension, and lack of finger noise contribute as well. If you can hear a difference with tone wide open on the bass, then there is a difference between the two.
 
Not gonna lie. I have a hard time hearing the difference between flats & rounds.

Seems to me that you can get the same sound out of rounds by turning your tone down.
While I agree you can mitigate some of the difference by adjusting your EQ/tone, there is a distinct difference in tonal character. You may get a better picture if instead of trying to make them sound the same, try making them sound totally different by adjusting your EQ,

Or.. Download a copy of Tower of Power’s What is Hip and anything from The Who’s Iive at leads LP. I’m fairly certain you will be able to hear the difference.