• TalkBass has been independent since 1998. Add your voice.
    Create a free account to reply to discussions, view embedded media, and browse with fewer display ads.
    Join freeLog in
    Want zero display ads or expanded classifieds tools? Compare plans.

Flatwound Strings: Sadowsky vs. Dr

These two strings are very similar and little has been written here about the DRs.
I have used them both and prefer the DR's which have less tension and better thump.
It's close though and both strings have a smooth feel, similarly priced, the Sadowskys have slightly better highs.
 
I am very interested in some more opinions this subject. I've been playing TI Jazz Flats for over 20 years on various basses ('69 Precision, '74 Jazz, 1984 Alembic Distillate, +...). I'm about a week away from picking up a Lakland 44-02 (w/Bartolinis) deluxe and the first thing I'm going to do is replace the roundwounds with flatwounds. I've narrowed it down to Rotosound 77s, the DR Hi-Beam flats and the Sadowsky flats.

Any wisdom/experience/opinions on feel and tone would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Scarrsese for bringing this up!
 
Ok, sounds sacrilegious rite? Ray+Flatwounds=not a stingray?

Totally crazy. They add a fender-like roundness to the stingray sound. They are surprisingly bright & clear for flats. ( I think because of the steel vs nickle )

Bonus

#1 Absolutely no signature "growl" of the Stingray has been lost.
#2 You can't hear your fingers on the strings as much

More bright then month old super slinkies right off the bat. They are not as slippery, but you will have that because of more surface area contact with your fingers vs roundwounds. ( also because of the steel)

I recommend steel flats as an alternative to nickle wounds for punch clarity.