Alkali Ike
Gold Supporting Member
- Jan 1, 2011
- 2,857
- 15,669
- Disclosures
- I never actually learned to play very well
EDIT: I thought HFR was 60 FPS. Apparently it's 48 FPS. I stand corrected.
Most current digital cinema projectors are capable of "HFR", High Frame Rate. There was a lot of pushback when Peter Jackson tried it. I have no idea if it's even remotely as good as Showscan though (I kind of doubt it). Sounds like he hasn't given up on it though.
The Desolation of Smaug shows Peter Jackson still hasn't perfected HFR
Why did nay-sayers dislike HFR on Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey? First off, many felt that the higher frame speed looked too real, revealing production flaws and ruining the suspension of disbelief. Worse, purists compared HFR to a cheap TV effect and called it vastly inferior to time-tested 24 fps. Though Jackson claimed to be unfazed by all the criticism, he did take it into account for Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. What audiences actually disliked about the first film, he felt, was not the HFR but the extra sharpness that resulted from filming digitally in 5K with Red's Epic cameras instead of film. To remedy that, he told Variety that actor-friendly "Pro-Mist" lens filters were used during filming to apply a slight blur and remove any harshness during certain shots. In addition, each scene was carefully color corrected to "take the (video-like) HD quality away" and he deemed the final results to be "reasonably successful."
Then there's this (contains some profanity):
Ang Lee Has Made the Most Realistic-Looking Movie Ever. It's Unwatchable.
Most current digital cinema projectors are capable of "HFR", High Frame Rate. There was a lot of pushback when Peter Jackson tried it. I have no idea if it's even remotely as good as Showscan though (I kind of doubt it). Sounds like he hasn't given up on it though.
The Desolation of Smaug shows Peter Jackson still hasn't perfected HFR
Why did nay-sayers dislike HFR on Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey? First off, many felt that the higher frame speed looked too real, revealing production flaws and ruining the suspension of disbelief. Worse, purists compared HFR to a cheap TV effect and called it vastly inferior to time-tested 24 fps. Though Jackson claimed to be unfazed by all the criticism, he did take it into account for Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug. What audiences actually disliked about the first film, he felt, was not the HFR but the extra sharpness that resulted from filming digitally in 5K with Red's Epic cameras instead of film. To remedy that, he told Variety that actor-friendly "Pro-Mist" lens filters were used during filming to apply a slight blur and remove any harshness during certain shots. In addition, each scene was carefully color corrected to "take the (video-like) HD quality away" and he deemed the final results to be "reasonably successful."
Then there's this (contains some profanity):
Ang Lee Has Made the Most Realistic-Looking Movie Ever. It's Unwatchable.
Last edited: